TY - JOUR
T1 - Making health services more accessible to rural locales. Do conceptualizations matter?
AU - Asante, D.
PY - 2021/9
Y1 - 2021/9
N2 - Dear Editor,Improving health services accessibility and health outcomes for nonurban residents remains a critical public health challenge worldwide [1], [2]. However, in relative terms, appreciable strides have been made in some developed countries such as Australia, Canada, USA, and UK [3], [4], [5]. A clear geographical classification through context specific indicators (population size, proximity to urban centres, predominant economic activities, etc) is what set these countries apart in rural health care provision. Thus, operationalization of the concept ‘rural’ and other related terminologies is critical for health services provision, policy, and research in underserved areas [5], [6].
AB - Dear Editor,Improving health services accessibility and health outcomes for nonurban residents remains a critical public health challenge worldwide [1], [2]. However, in relative terms, appreciable strides have been made in some developed countries such as Australia, Canada, USA, and UK [3], [4], [5]. A clear geographical classification through context specific indicators (population size, proximity to urban centres, predominant economic activities, etc) is what set these countries apart in rural health care provision. Thus, operationalization of the concept ‘rural’ and other related terminologies is critical for health services provision, policy, and research in underserved areas [5], [6].
KW - Ghana
KW - Health outcomes
KW - Remote
KW - Rural
KW - Rural definition
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85107153361&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jemep.2021.100670
DO - 10.1016/j.jemep.2021.100670
M3 - Letter
AN - SCOPUS:85107153361
SN - 2352-5533
VL - 18
JO - Ethics, Medicine and Public Health
JF - Ethics, Medicine and Public Health
M1 - 100670
ER -