Abstract
Intrathoracic synovial sarcomas (SSas) are well documented in the literature and characterized by a distinctive t(X;18) translocation. The histologic appearances of a monophasic or biphasic SSa can lead to confusion with biphasic or sarcomatoid mesothelioma (MM). The distinction of pleural SSa from pleural MM is important, because SSas may be responsive to ifosfamide-based chemotherapy and have no proven causal relationship to prior asbestos exposure. Demonstration of the t(X;18) by cytogenetics, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) or reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction is the gold standard for diagnosis, but availability of molecular diagnosis can be limited and testing is time consuming. Recently, it has been suggested that immunohistochemistry (IHC) for transducin-like enhancer of split 1 (TLE) is reliable for diagnosis of SSa and may replace molecular diagnosis.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | S2018 |
| Number of pages | 1 |
| Journal | Journal of Thoracic Oncology |
| Volume | 12 |
| Issue number | 11 (suppl. 2) |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Nov 2017 |
| Event | 18th World Conference on Lung Cancer: International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC) - Yokohama, Japan Duration: 15 Oct 2017 → 18 Oct 2017 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- Pathology Diagnosis
- Mesothelioma
- Synovial sarcoma
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Malignant mesothelioma versus synovial sarcoma: an analysis of 19 cases with molecular diagnosis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver