Managing the Exponential Growth of Mendelian Randomization Studies

Marcus Munafò, Jamie Brown, Marita Hefler, George Davey Smith

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorial

3 Citations (Scopus)
10 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Much of the research we publish relates to questions of cause and effect. In an ideal world, we would subject these questions to experimentation, randomizing study participants to different conditions. However, in many cases—particularly in the context of addiction—such randomization is simply not possible. We cannot randomize tobacco-naïve children to use e-cigarettes, for example, to determine whether or not vaping acts as a “gateway” to subsequent smoking. In these cases, we have to rely on observational methods, and these suffer from well-described problems of confounding, including reverse causality.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1273-1275
Number of pages3
JournalNicotine and Tobacco Research
Volume26
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2024
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • genetic confounding
  • genome-wide association studies
  • GWAS
  • Mendelian randomization
  • MR
  • STROBE-MR guidelines
  • Tobacco industry
  • smoking
  • vaping
  • Addiction
  • Advocacy
  • Awareness
  • Carcinogens

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Managing the Exponential Growth of Mendelian Randomization Studies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this