Managing the exponential growth of mendelian randomization studies

Marcus R. Munafo, Jamie Brown, Marita Hefler, George Davey Smith

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorial

2 Citations (Scopus)
12 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Much of the research we publish relates to questions of cause and effect. In an ideal world, we would subject these questions to experimentation, randomising study participants to different conditions. However, in many cases – particularly in the context of addiction – such randomization is simply not possible. We cannot randomise tobacco-naïve children to use e-cigarettes, for example, to determine whether or not vaping acts as a ‘gateway’ to subsequent smoking. In these cases, we have to rely on observational methods, and these suffer from well described problems of confounding, including reverse causality.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)559-560
Number of pages2
JournalTobacco Control
Volume33
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2024
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • genetic confounding
  • genome-wide association studies
  • GWAS
  • Mendelian randomization
  • MR
  • STROBE-MR guidelines
  • Tobacco industry
  • Addiction
  • Advocacy
  • Awareness
  • Carcinogens
  • smoking
  • vaping

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Managing the exponential growth of mendelian randomization studies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this