Abstract
Much of the research we publish relates to questions of cause and effect. In an ideal world, we would subject these questions to experimentation, randomising study participants to different conditions. However, in many cases – particularly in the context of addiction – such randomization is simply not possible. We cannot randomise tobacco-naïve children to use e-cigarettes, for example, to determine whether or not vaping acts as a ‘gateway’ to subsequent smoking. In these cases, we have to rely on observational methods, and these suffer from well described problems of confounding, including reverse causality.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 559-560 |
| Number of pages | 2 |
| Journal | Tobacco Control |
| Volume | 33 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Sept 2024 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- genetic confounding
- genome-wide association studies
- GWAS
- Mendelian randomization
- MR
- STROBE-MR guidelines
- Tobacco industry
- Addiction
- Advocacy
- Awareness
- Carcinogens
- smoking
- vaping
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Managing the exponential growth of mendelian randomization studies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver