TY - JOUR
T1 - Measuring priority symptoms in advanced bladder cancer
T2 - Development and initial validation of a brief symptom index
AU - Jensen, S
AU - Beaumont, Jennifer
AU - Jacobsen, Paul
AU - Abernethy, Amy
AU - Syrjala, Karen
AU - Cella, David
PY - 2013/1/1
Y1 - 2013/1/1
N2 - Background: Improved measurement of clinically meaningful symptoms is needed in advanced bladder cancer. Objective: This study developed and examined the initial reliability and validity of a new measure of advanced bladder cancerspecific symptoms, the NCCN-FACT Bladder Symptom Index-18 (NFBlSI-18), which assesses the symptoms perceived as most important by patients and oncology clinical experts. Methods: A total of 31 individuals with advanced bladder cancer rated the importance of 28 symptoms. In addition, 10 oncology clinical experts rated symptoms as treatment- or disease-related. Patient-rated symptoms were reconciled with published clinicians' symptom priorities, producing the NFBlSI-18. Participants completed measures of quality of life (QOL) and performance status to examine initial validity. Results: An 18-item symptom index for advanced bladder cancer included 3 subscales: disease-related symptoms, treatment side effects, and general function/well-being. Lower scores indicate greater symptom burden. Preliminary reliability reveals good internal consistency for the full NFBlSI-18 (α = 0.83). The NFBlSI-18 was significantly associated with QOL criteria and performance status, in the expected direction. Limitations: Limitations include the cross-sectional design and the relatively low reliability of the disease-related symptoms subscale. Conclusion: The NFBlSI-18 demonstrates preliminary evidence as a valid brief measure of the most important symptoms of advanced bladder cancer, as rated by both patients and oncology clinical experts. The NFBlSI-18 should have greater acceptability to regulatory authorities than previously developed questionnaires.
AB - Background: Improved measurement of clinically meaningful symptoms is needed in advanced bladder cancer. Objective: This study developed and examined the initial reliability and validity of a new measure of advanced bladder cancerspecific symptoms, the NCCN-FACT Bladder Symptom Index-18 (NFBlSI-18), which assesses the symptoms perceived as most important by patients and oncology clinical experts. Methods: A total of 31 individuals with advanced bladder cancer rated the importance of 28 symptoms. In addition, 10 oncology clinical experts rated symptoms as treatment- or disease-related. Patient-rated symptoms were reconciled with published clinicians' symptom priorities, producing the NFBlSI-18. Participants completed measures of quality of life (QOL) and performance status to examine initial validity. Results: An 18-item symptom index for advanced bladder cancer included 3 subscales: disease-related symptoms, treatment side effects, and general function/well-being. Lower scores indicate greater symptom burden. Preliminary reliability reveals good internal consistency for the full NFBlSI-18 (α = 0.83). The NFBlSI-18 was significantly associated with QOL criteria and performance status, in the expected direction. Limitations: Limitations include the cross-sectional design and the relatively low reliability of the disease-related symptoms subscale. Conclusion: The NFBlSI-18 demonstrates preliminary evidence as a valid brief measure of the most important symptoms of advanced bladder cancer, as rated by both patients and oncology clinical experts. The NFBlSI-18 should have greater acceptability to regulatory authorities than previously developed questionnaires.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84883485757&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Article
SN - 1544-6794
VL - 11
SP - 86
EP - 93
JO - The Journal of Supportive Oncology
JF - The Journal of Supportive Oncology
IS - 2
ER -