Abstract
In their commentary, Meyer, Otgaar, and Smeets (2015) raise several important issues about the definitions, characteristics and applications of various involuntary cognitive phenomena. Here we respond to the comments of Meyer et al. in ways that we hope will advance understanding of these issues, and inform future research. In particular, we have focused on the characteristics of involuntary phenomena-particularly in relation to meta-awareness-and the clinical relevance of mind-wandering.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1-3 |
Number of pages | 3 |
Journal | Consciousness and Cognition |
Volume | 34 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Jul 2015 |
Keywords
- Involuntary cognition
- Meta-awareness
- Mind-wandering
- Trauma