Iris Murdoch at her best is a brilliant prose stylist, but in her late philosophy her writing often appears dutiful and hard-won. Remarks about the difficulty of writing Metaphysics as a Guide to Morals (MGM) in her correspondence and diaries confirm this impression. However, in MGM the writing becomes lively and engaging when certain philosophers are discussed. Her discussions of Arthur Schopenhauer employ her most characteristic and vivid prose, for example, and she compares his philosophical style with Ludwig Wittgenstein’s more fastidious sensibility. In this chapter, I consider Murdoch’s attitude to the ‘quarrel’ between philosophy and literature, before undertaking a reading of MGM as a literary work, paying particular attention to Murdoch’s rhetoric and characterisation, and the moments when her trademark literary style emerges.
|Title of host publication||Reading Iris Murdoch's Metaphysics as a Guide to Morals|
|Editors||Nora Hamalainen, Gillian Dooley|
|Place of Publication||Cham, Switzerland|
|Number of pages||14|
|Publication status||Published - Jun 2019|
Dooley, G. (2019). Metaphysics as a Guide to Morals: The Debate Between Literature and Philosophy. In N. Hamalainen, & G. Dooley (Eds.), Reading Iris Murdoch's Metaphysics as a Guide to Morals (pp. 93-106). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18967-9_7