Metaphysics as a Guide to Morals: The Debate Between Literature and Philosophy

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

Iris Murdoch at her best is a brilliant prose stylist, but in her late philosophy her writing often appears dutiful and hard-won. Remarks about the difficulty of writing Metaphysics as a Guide to Morals (MGM) in her correspondence and diaries confirm this impression. However, in MGM the writing becomes lively and engaging when certain philosophers are discussed. Her discussions of Arthur Schopenhauer employ her most characteristic and vivid prose, for example, and she compares his philosophical style with Ludwig Wittgenstein’s more fastidious sensibility. In this chapter, I consider Murdoch’s attitude to the ‘quarrel’ between philosophy and literature, before undertaking a reading of MGM as a literary work, paying particular attention to Murdoch’s rhetoric and characterisation, and the moments when her trademark literary style emerges.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationReading Iris Murdoch's Metaphysics as a Guide to Morals
EditorsNora Hamalainen, Gillian Dooley
Place of PublicationCham, Switzerland
PublisherPalgrave Macmillan
Chapter7
Pages93-106
Number of pages14
ISBN (Electronic)978-3-030-18967-9
ISBN (Print)978-3-030-18966-2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2019

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Metaphysics as a Guide to Morals: The Debate Between Literature and Philosophy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Dooley, G. (2019). Metaphysics as a Guide to Morals: The Debate Between Literature and Philosophy. In N. Hamalainen, & G. Dooley (Eds.), Reading Iris Murdoch's Metaphysics as a Guide to Morals (pp. 93-106). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18967-9_7