Microvascular density using the Chalkley method: a potential alternative to the World Health Organization nuclear grading in pleural mesothelioma prognostication

Revania Pillay, Ashleigh J. Hocking, Sarita Prabhakaran, Sonja Klebe

Research output: Contribution to journalLetterpeer-review

Abstract

To the Editor,
Pleural mesothelioma is a malignancy of the thoracic serosa. Outcomes are typically poor, but prognostication is challenging. Applied prognostic factors include age, gender and histological subtype, with epithelioid and biphasic mesothelioma having better outcomes than sarcomatoid mesothelioma.1,2 The World Health Organization (WHO) currently recommends the use of a two-tier grading system that is only applicable to epithelioid mesothelioma, which in some studies shows moderate agreement and reproducibility.3,4 Blood flow is essential for tumour growth and high microvascular density (MVD) is an adverse prognostic factor for pleural mesothelioma.5,6 We aimed to determine the suitability of MVD assessed by the Chalkley method for prognostication in all histological subtypes of mesothelioma and compared this with the WHO two-tier grading system for epithelioid mesothelioma.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)505-506
Number of pages2
JournalPathology
Volume57
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2025

Keywords

  • Microvascular density
  • Chalkley method
  • pleural mesothelioma
  • prognostication
  • thoracic serosa
  • biopsies

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Microvascular density using the Chalkley method: a potential alternative to the World Health Organization nuclear grading in pleural mesothelioma prognostication'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this