Abstract
Although there is a great deal of research focused on identification issues related to own-versus other-race faces very few experiments have explored whether metacognitive monitoring contributes to the own-race bias. In the current experiment the typical own-race bias paradigm was modified so that type-2 signal detection measures (e.g. Higham & Arnold, 2007a,b) could be used to directly measure metacognitive monitoring at retrieval. A second goal of the experiment was to explore whether self-reported confidence ratings differed depending on whether they were directed at answer accuracy (e.g., judging a face as "studied") versus at decisions about that answer (e.g., volunteering vs. withholding that answer). Overall the results demonstrated that monitoring does contribute to the own-race bias, in that participants were better at monitoring their memory for own-race faces. Further, there was a significant difference between the two confidence measures, and the pattern of this difference depended on whether responses had been volunteered or withheld.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 380-389 |
Number of pages | 10 |
Journal | Acta Psychologica |
Volume | 144 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Oct 2013 |
Keywords
- Confidence
- Meta-metacognition
- Monitoring
- Own-race bias
- Strategic regulation of accuracy