TY - JOUR
T1 - Multi-night measurement for diagnosis and simplified monitoring of obstructive sleep apnoea
AU - Lechat, Bastien
AU - Scott, Hannah
AU - Manners, Jack
AU - Adams, Robert
AU - Proctor, Simon
AU - Mukherjee, Sutapa
AU - Catcheside, Peter
AU - Eckert, Danny J.
AU - Vakulin, Andrew
AU - Reynolds, Amy C.
PY - 2023/12
Y1 - 2023/12
N2 - Substantial night-to-night variability in obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) severity has raised misdiagnosis and misdirected treatment concerns with the current prevailing single-night diagnostic approach. In-home, multi-night sleep monitoring technology may provide a feasible complimentary diagnostic pathway to improve both the speed and accuracy of OSA diagnosis and monitor treatment efficacy. This review describes the latest evidence on night-to-night variability in OSA severity, and its impact on OSA diagnostic misclassification. Emerging evidence for the potential impact of night-to-night variability in OSA severity to influence important health risk outcomes associated with OSA is considered. This review also characterises emerging diagnostic applications of wearable and non-wearable technologies that may provide an alternative, or complimentary, approach to traditional OSA diagnostic pathways. The required evidence to translate these devices into clinical care is also discussed. Appropriately sized randomised controlled trials are needed to determine the most appropriate and effective technologies for OSA diagnosis, as well as the optimal number of nights needed for accurate diagnosis and management. Potential risks versus benefits, patient perspectives, and cost-effectiveness of these novel approaches should be carefully considered in future trials.
AB - Substantial night-to-night variability in obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) severity has raised misdiagnosis and misdirected treatment concerns with the current prevailing single-night diagnostic approach. In-home, multi-night sleep monitoring technology may provide a feasible complimentary diagnostic pathway to improve both the speed and accuracy of OSA diagnosis and monitor treatment efficacy. This review describes the latest evidence on night-to-night variability in OSA severity, and its impact on OSA diagnostic misclassification. Emerging evidence for the potential impact of night-to-night variability in OSA severity to influence important health risk outcomes associated with OSA is considered. This review also characterises emerging diagnostic applications of wearable and non-wearable technologies that may provide an alternative, or complimentary, approach to traditional OSA diagnostic pathways. The required evidence to translate these devices into clinical care is also discussed. Appropriately sized randomised controlled trials are needed to determine the most appropriate and effective technologies for OSA diagnosis, as well as the optimal number of nights needed for accurate diagnosis and management. Potential risks versus benefits, patient perspectives, and cost-effectiveness of these novel approaches should be carefully considered in future trials.
KW - Consumer sleep tracker
KW - OSA
KW - Polysomnography
KW - Wearable device
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85169881526&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://purl.org/au-research/grants/NHMRC/1116942
UR - http://purl.org/au-research/grants/NHMRC/1159499
U2 - 10.1016/j.smrv.2023.101843
DO - 10.1016/j.smrv.2023.101843
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85169881526
SN - 1087-0792
VL - 72
JO - Sleep Medicine Reviews
JF - Sleep Medicine Reviews
M1 - 101843
ER -