Abstract
The idea that governance has replaced government, and that networks have replaced hierarchy as the dominant mode of governance, have become mainstream views in the public policy literature. In this article, we consider a key initiative of the Rudd government in Australia, the 2020 Summit, which, at first sight, seems like an example of network governance in action. Having considered the operation and outcomes of the Summit, however, we argue that it more accurately illustrates how governments, perhaps particularly in Westminster systems, attempt to preserve hierarchy, through a process of metagovernance.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 651-667 |
| Number of pages | 17 |
| Journal | Australian Journal of Political Science |
| Volume | 46 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2011 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- citizen engagement
- governance
- metagovernance
- network governance
- public policy
- Westminster
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Network Governance and the 2020 Summit'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver