Abstract
In a number of previous essays, I have proposed a distinction between film history and cinema history: that is, between an aesthetic history of textual relations among individuals and individual objects and the social history of a cultural institution. Film history, the history of textual relations and stylistic influence, borrows its methods and rationale from the practices of art and literary history. It is predominantly a history of production and producers, concerned with issues of intention and agency underpinning the process of cultural production, often at the level of the individual, less frequently at the level of the institution, and it is relatively little interested in anything, other than aesthetic influence, that happens beyond the point of production.
By contrast, writing the social history of cinema is a project engaging, on the one hand, with elements of economic, industrial, and institutional history in accounts of how the commercial institution of cinema operated and, on the other with the sociocultural history of its audiences...
By contrast, writing the social history of cinema is a project engaging, on the one hand, with elements of economic, industrial, and institutional history in accounts of how the commercial institution of cinema operated and, on the other with the sociocultural history of its audiences...
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Resetting the Scene |
Subtitle of host publication | Classical Hollywood Revisited |
Editors | Philippa Gates, Katherine Spring |
Place of Publication | Detroit, MI |
Publisher | Wayne State University Press |
Chapter | 25 |
Pages | 300-308 |
Number of pages | 9 |
ISBN (Electronic) | 9780814347812 |
ISBN (Print) | 9780814347799, 9780814347805 |
Publication status | Published - 2021 |
Publication series
Name | Contemporary Approaches to Film and Media Series |
---|---|
Publisher | Wayne State University Press |
Keywords
- Film history and criticism
- Film theory