Newer equations better predict lung age in smokers: a retrospective analysis using a cohort of randomly selected participants

Wendy Newbury, Michelle Lorimer, Alan Crockett

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    5 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Aims: To produce new lung age equations using four previously published predictive equations for forced expiratory volume in 1 second and to compare them with lung age equations published in 1985 and 2010. Methods: Initial comparisons used phantom subjects of different ages and levels of lung function. Comparison of lung age equations by regression analysis used an independent dataset of 3,206 randomly selected community-dwelling adults aged >18 years in the North West Adelaide Health Study. Results: The more recent equations estimated lung age as greater than chronological age as lung function decreased, whereas the oldest equations estimated lung age as less than chronological age until lung function was severely limited. Significant differences (p<0.001) were detected by regression analysis, with four newer lung age equations being significantly different from the 1985 equation and one being no different. Conclusions: Lung age estimates using six predictive equations spanning 50 years show differences attributable to cohort and period effects. This reinforces the need for regular updating of predictive equations for lung function. These results further confirm the need to use modern lung age equations which will provide a stronger message in smoking cessation counselling.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)78-84
    Number of pages7
    JournalPrimary Care Respiratory Journal
    Volume21
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2012

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Newer equations better predict lung age in smokers: a retrospective analysis using a cohort of randomly selected participants'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this