Abstract
Despite Institutional Review Board concerns about psychological harm arising from research participation, evidence from trauma-questionnaire research suggests that participation is typically well-tolerated by participants. Yet, it is unclear how participant experiences of in-lab trauma simulations align with IRB ethical guidelines. Thus, we compared reactions to a trauma film paradigm with reactions to a positive film task or cognitive tasks. Overall, relative to other conditions, the trauma film was well-tolerated by participants: they generally reported low-to-moderate negative emotions, moderate benefits, and that participation was not worse than everyday stressors. Our results have implications for the research community in designing trauma-based research.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1-17 |
| Number of pages | 17 |
| Journal | Ethics and Behavior |
| Volume | 33 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Early online date | 8 Nov 2021 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2023 |
Keywords
- Ethics
- minimal risk
- trauma film paradigm
- trauma research
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'No more than discomfort: the trauma film paradigm meets definitions of minimal-risk research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver