TY - JOUR
T1 - Non-invasive brain stimulation in the treatment of post-stroke aphasia
T2 - a scoping review
AU - Williams, Ellen E.R.
AU - Sghirripa, Sabrina
AU - Rogasch, Nigel C.
AU - Hordacre, Brenton
AU - Attrill, Stacie
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Purpose: Aphasia is an acquired language impairment that commonly results from stroke. Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) might accelerate aphasia recovery trajectories and has seen mounting popularity in recent aphasia rehabilitation research. The present review aimed to: (1) summarise all existing literature on NIBS as a post-stroke aphasia treatment; and (2) provide recommendations for future NIBS-aphasia research. Materials and methods: Databases for published and grey literature were searched using scoping review methodology. 278 journal articles, conference abstracts/posters, and books, and 38 items of grey literature, were included for analysis. Results: Quantitative analysis revealed that ipsilesional anodal transcranial direct current stimulation and contralesional 1-Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation were the most widely used forms of NIBS, while qualitative analysis identified four key themes including: the roles of the hemispheres in aphasia recovery and their relationship with NIBS; heterogeneity of individuals but homogeneity of subpopulations; individualisation of stimulation parameters; and much remains under-explored in the NIBS-aphasia literature. Conclusions: Taken together, these results highlighted systemic challenges across the field such as small sample sizes, inter-individual variability, lack of protocol optimisation/standardisation, and inadequate focus on aphasiology. Four key recommendations are outlined herein to guide future research and refine NIBS methods for post-stroke aphasia treatment.
AB - Purpose: Aphasia is an acquired language impairment that commonly results from stroke. Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) might accelerate aphasia recovery trajectories and has seen mounting popularity in recent aphasia rehabilitation research. The present review aimed to: (1) summarise all existing literature on NIBS as a post-stroke aphasia treatment; and (2) provide recommendations for future NIBS-aphasia research. Materials and methods: Databases for published and grey literature were searched using scoping review methodology. 278 journal articles, conference abstracts/posters, and books, and 38 items of grey literature, were included for analysis. Results: Quantitative analysis revealed that ipsilesional anodal transcranial direct current stimulation and contralesional 1-Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation were the most widely used forms of NIBS, while qualitative analysis identified four key themes including: the roles of the hemispheres in aphasia recovery and their relationship with NIBS; heterogeneity of individuals but homogeneity of subpopulations; individualisation of stimulation parameters; and much remains under-explored in the NIBS-aphasia literature. Conclusions: Taken together, these results highlighted systemic challenges across the field such as small sample sizes, inter-individual variability, lack of protocol optimisation/standardisation, and inadequate focus on aphasiology. Four key recommendations are outlined herein to guide future research and refine NIBS methods for post-stroke aphasia treatment.
KW - Aphasia
KW - non-invasive brain stimulation
KW - rehabilitation
KW - repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation
KW - stroke
KW - transcranial direct current stimulation
KW - transcranial magnetic stimulation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85174013480&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://purl.org/au-research/grants/ARC/FT210100694
U2 - 10.1080/09638288.2023.2259299
DO - 10.1080/09638288.2023.2259299
M3 - Review article
C2 - 37828899
AN - SCOPUS:85174013480
SN - 0963-8288
VL - 46
SP - 3802
EP - 3826
JO - Disability and Rehabilitation
JF - Disability and Rehabilitation
IS - 17
ER -