Open access: The whipping boy for problems in scholarly communication—A response to the rebuttals

Danny A. Kingsley, Mary Anne Kennan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)


In this paper, we respond to five rebuttals to Kingsley and Kennan (2015). Four researchers in the information systems field and a university library director of research infrastructure provided these rebuttals. Almost without exception, the rebuttals from the information systems researchers take an analytical approach to the question of scholarly communication in their field. However, in undertaking their individual analyses of scholarly publishing or communication, they do not directly address the issues raised in our original debate piece. The rebuttal from the university library administrator (Groenewegen, 2015) alone directly addresses the discussion points raised in the original debate. As researchers in the field of scholarly communications, while this was not how we originally envisione d the debate, the rebuttals as a body of work have opened up some interesting themes, which we explore in addition to responding to the individual rebuttals.

Original languageEnglish
Article number20
Pages (from-to)383-394
Number of pages12
JournalCommunications of the Association for Information Systems
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2015
Externally publishedYes


  • Article processing charges
  • Hybrid publishing
  • Institutional repositories
  • Mega journals
  • Open access
  • Predatory publishing
  • Scholarly publishing
  • Subscriptions


Dive into the research topics of 'Open access: The whipping boy for problems in scholarly communication—A response to the rebuttals'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this