TY - JOUR
T1 - Operationalising digital soil mapping – Lessons from Australia
AU - Kidd, Darren
AU - Searle, Ross
AU - Grundy, Mike
AU - McBratney, Alex
AU - Robinson, Nathan
AU - O'Brien, Lauren
AU - Zund, Peter
AU - Arrouays, Dominique
AU - Thomas, Mark
AU - Padarian, José
AU - Jones, Edward
AU - Bennett, John Mc Lean
AU - Minasny, Budiman
AU - Holmes, Karen
AU - Malone, Brendan P.
AU - Liddicoat, Craig
AU - Meier, Elizabeth A.
AU - Stockmann, Uta
AU - Wilson, Peter
AU - Wilford, John
AU - Payne, Jim
AU - Ringrose-Voase, Anthony
AU - Slater, Brian
AU - Odgers, Nathan
AU - Gray, Jonathan
AU - van Gool, Dennis
AU - Andrews, Kaitlyn
AU - Harms, Ben
AU - Stower, Liz
AU - Triantafilis, John
PY - 2020/12
Y1 - 2020/12
N2 - Australia has advanced the science and application of Digital Soil Mapping (DSM). Over the past decade, DSM in Australia has evolved from being purely research focused to become ‘operational’, where it is embedded into many soil-agency land resource assessment programs around the country. This has resulted from a series of ‘drivers’, such as an increased need for better quality and more complete soil information, and ‘enablers’, such as existing soil information systems, covariate development, serendipitous project funding, collaborations, and Australian DSM ‘champions’. However, these accomplishments were not met without some barriers along the way, such as a need to demonstrate and prove the science to the soil science community, and rapidly enable the various soil agencies' capacity to implement DSM. The long history of soil mapping in Australia has influenced the evolution and culmination of the operational DSM procedures, products and infrastructure in widespread use today, which is highlighted by several recent and significant Australian operational DSM case-studies at various extents. A set of operational DSM ‘workflows’ and ‘lessons learnt’ have also emerged from Australian DSM applications, which may provide some useful information and templates for other countries hoping to fast-track their own operational DSM capacity. However, some persistent themes were identified, such as applicable scale, and communicating uncertainty and map quality to end-users, which will need further development to progress operational DSM.
AB - Australia has advanced the science and application of Digital Soil Mapping (DSM). Over the past decade, DSM in Australia has evolved from being purely research focused to become ‘operational’, where it is embedded into many soil-agency land resource assessment programs around the country. This has resulted from a series of ‘drivers’, such as an increased need for better quality and more complete soil information, and ‘enablers’, such as existing soil information systems, covariate development, serendipitous project funding, collaborations, and Australian DSM ‘champions’. However, these accomplishments were not met without some barriers along the way, such as a need to demonstrate and prove the science to the soil science community, and rapidly enable the various soil agencies' capacity to implement DSM. The long history of soil mapping in Australia has influenced the evolution and culmination of the operational DSM procedures, products and infrastructure in widespread use today, which is highlighted by several recent and significant Australian operational DSM case-studies at various extents. A set of operational DSM ‘workflows’ and ‘lessons learnt’ have also emerged from Australian DSM applications, which may provide some useful information and templates for other countries hoping to fast-track their own operational DSM capacity. However, some persistent themes were identified, such as applicable scale, and communicating uncertainty and map quality to end-users, which will need further development to progress operational DSM.
KW - Australia
KW - Digital soil assessment
KW - Digital soil mapping
KW - Land resource assessment
KW - Multiple soil classes
KW - Operational
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85092055075&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.geodrs.2020.e00335
DO - 10.1016/j.geodrs.2020.e00335
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85092055075
SN - 2352-0094
VL - 23
JO - Geoderma Regional
JF - Geoderma Regional
M1 - e00335
ER -