Oral nutrition in labour: 'Whose choice is it anyway?' A review of the literature

Ruth King, Pauline Glover, Kathryn Byrt, Leonie Porter-Nocella

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    5 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Objective: to identify factors affecting women's oral nutrition in labour. Design: literature review (1988-2009). Setting: Westernised maternity care settings. Participants: women, midwives, obstetricians, anaesthetists and hospitals. Measurements and findings: when addressing labour stages, the risk categorisation of women and maternal/fetal birthing outcomes, there was a lack of consistent evidence identifying adverse outcomes for mothers/infants when oral nutrition in labour had occurred. Key conclusions: little evidence exists to support the continuance of restrictive practices around oral nutrition in labour for all women. Women's choice is impacted by health practitioners' opinions, experience and practice methods and policy (or lack thereof). Policies are not reflective of current evidence. Implications for practice: women's choices and desires regarding oral nutrition in labour need to be addressed. Clear guidelines/policies need to be established based on current evidence. Midwives need greater exposure to research, as well as involvement in policy development and implementation.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)674-686
    Number of pages13
    JournalMidwifery
    Volume27
    Issue number5
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2011

    Keywords

    • Choice
    • Labour
    • Oral nutrition
    • Women

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Oral nutrition in labour: 'Whose choice is it anyway?' A review of the literature'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this