TY - JOUR
T1 - Oral nutrition in labour
T2 - 'Whose choice is it anyway?' A review of the literature
AU - King, Ruth
AU - Glover, Pauline
AU - Byrt, Kathryn
AU - Porter-Nocella, Leonie
PY - 2011/10/1
Y1 - 2011/10/1
N2 - Objective: to identify factors affecting women's oral nutrition in labour. Design: literature review (1988-2009). Setting: Westernised maternity care settings. Participants: women, midwives, obstetricians, anaesthetists and hospitals. Measurements and findings: when addressing labour stages, the risk categorisation of women and maternal/fetal birthing outcomes, there was a lack of consistent evidence identifying adverse outcomes for mothers/infants when oral nutrition in labour had occurred. Key conclusions: little evidence exists to support the continuance of restrictive practices around oral nutrition in labour for all women. Women's choice is impacted by health practitioners' opinions, experience and practice methods and policy (or lack thereof). Policies are not reflective of current evidence. Implications for practice: women's choices and desires regarding oral nutrition in labour need to be addressed. Clear guidelines/policies need to be established based on current evidence. Midwives need greater exposure to research, as well as involvement in policy development and implementation.
AB - Objective: to identify factors affecting women's oral nutrition in labour. Design: literature review (1988-2009). Setting: Westernised maternity care settings. Participants: women, midwives, obstetricians, anaesthetists and hospitals. Measurements and findings: when addressing labour stages, the risk categorisation of women and maternal/fetal birthing outcomes, there was a lack of consistent evidence identifying adverse outcomes for mothers/infants when oral nutrition in labour had occurred. Key conclusions: little evidence exists to support the continuance of restrictive practices around oral nutrition in labour for all women. Women's choice is impacted by health practitioners' opinions, experience and practice methods and policy (or lack thereof). Policies are not reflective of current evidence. Implications for practice: women's choices and desires regarding oral nutrition in labour need to be addressed. Clear guidelines/policies need to be established based on current evidence. Midwives need greater exposure to research, as well as involvement in policy development and implementation.
KW - Choice
KW - Labour
KW - Oral nutrition
KW - Women
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80052677324&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.midw.2010.05.006
DO - 10.1016/j.midw.2010.05.006
M3 - Review article
SN - 0266-6138
VL - 27
SP - 674
EP - 686
JO - Midwifery
JF - Midwifery
IS - 5
ER -