Our experience of shorter stay and lower cost for local vs general anaesthetic placement of tracheoesophageal fistulae in twenty-seven patients

Anna K. Megow, Rachel K. Goggin, Vikram Padhye, Suren Krishnan, Andrew Foreman, John-Charles Hodge

Research output: Contribution to journalLetterpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Tracheoesophageal fistula (TOF) formation and voice prosthesis(VP) placement is the standard for voice restoration in post‐laryngectomy patients.1 This is performed primarily at the time of laryngectomy or as a secondary procedure following ablative surgery. Delayed VP placement has been largely supplanted by immediate placement; however, some patients require a delay. Puncture methods vary, but historically, it is undertaken under general anaesthesia (GA). This can be technically difficult or impossible, lengthy and financially cumbersome for undertaking institutions.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)423-426
Number of pages4
JournalClinical Otolaryngology
Volume44
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2019
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Tracheoesophageal fistula
  • voice prosthesis
  • post-laryngectomy
  • Ablative surgery
  • General anaesthesia
  • Local anaesthesia
  • surgery cost

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Our experience of shorter stay and lower cost for local vs general anaesthetic placement of tracheoesophageal fistulae in twenty-seven patients'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this