Outcome measures for palliative care research

Meera Agar, Tim Luckett

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

    4 Citations (Scopus)


    Purpose of review The aim of this review is to summarize the current state of the science in physical symptoms and other endof-life care domains and/or illness-specific outcomes in palliative care. The review includes progress in outcome measure development and interpretation, with specific reference to the clinical trial context. Recent findings There are validated measures in a wide range of domains, which can measure outcomes specific to palliative care interventions; which are sufficiently validated to ensure the results of the trial are robust and measuring differences which are both clinically meaningful. In several areas, consensus is emerging which will allow consolidation of outcome measurement and the ability to extend measurement from the clinical trial setting into routine clinical practice. Potential exists for composite measures covering areas prioritized by patients to improve comparability and efficiency. Adverse events need to be measured with the same degree of rigor as efficacy outcomes. Summary Clinical trials of palliative care interventions need to consider a range of outcomes, however, the choice and timing of measurement of the primary outcome need to be guided by the domain most likely to be influenced by the intervention.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)500-507
    Number of pages8
    JournalCurrent Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care
    Issue number4
    Publication statusPublished - Dec 2012


    • Clinical trial
    • Outcome assessment
    • Palliative care


    Dive into the research topics of 'Outcome measures for palliative care research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this