TY - JOUR
T1 - Parental Adjustment Scale
T2 - Validation of a brief, five-item measure of parental adjustment for use with families of typically developing children and children with developmental and/or intellectual disabilities in Australia
AU - Kelly, Eliza
AU - Day, Jamin J.
AU - Hodges, Julie
AU - Tellegen, Cassandra L.
AU - Ma, Tianyi
AU - Sanders, Matthew R.
AU - Tonge, Bruce
AU - Einfeld, Stewart
AU - Sofronoff, Kate
AU - Gray, Kylie M.
AU - Mazzucchelli, Trevor G.
AU - The MHYPEDD Team
AU - Howlin, Patricia
AU - Emerson, Eric
AU - Arciuli, Joanne
AU - Rice, Lauren
AU - Horstead, Sian
AU - Clarke, Kristina
AU - Bezzina, Louise
AU - Evans, Holly
AU - Andersson, Ellaina
AU - McAuliffe, Zyra
AU - Haas, Kaaran
AU - Louie, Eva
AU - Hoath, Fiona
AU - Worrall, Sheena
AU - Stace, Lucile
AU - Silove, Natalie
AU - Kostelas, Pauline
AU - Caruana, Jodie
AU - Dossetor, David
AU - Salvador-Carulla, Luis
AU - Henderson, Kevin
AU - Schoch, Martha
AU - Phillis, Kathryne
AU - Rotolone, Cassandra
AU - Henry, Tania
AU - Panahi, Babak
AU - Aery, Anagha
AU - Hinton, Sharon
AU - Thompson, Donna Marie
AU - Ommensen, Berthine
AU - Taffe, John
AU - Hu, Nan
AU - Boland, Ross
AU - Knott, Rachael
AU - O’Hagan, Gemma
AU - Rose, Oriel
AU - Shortt, Fionnuala
AU - Cawood, Danyelle
AU - Blackmore, Rebecca
AU - Wallman, Emily
AU - Keating, Caroline
AU - Teague, Samantha J.
AU - Viney, Rosalie
AU - Goodall, Stephen
AU - Arora, Sheena
PY - 2022/9
Y1 - 2022/9
N2 - Background: Explores the validity of the five-item parental adjustment scale, a subscale of the previously validated Parenting and Family Adjustment Scales. Aim: The aim was to assess the factor structure and convergent validity of a measure of parental adjustment within parents of typically developing children and parents of children with developmental and/or intellectual disabilities. Methods and procedures: Cross-sectional survey data was analysed from Australian parents of children aged 2-12 years who were typically developing children (N = 683) and had developmental and/or intellectual disabilities (N = 756). Confirmatory factor analyses and multi-group structural equation modelling examined if the factor structure performed similarly across the two populations. Convergent validity was assessed. Outcomes and results: The confirmatory factor analysis supported the hypothesised one-factor structure for the parental adjustment scale in both populations. Partial measurement invariance confirmed that the scale was structurally consistent within both parent groups. The convergent validity was supported by significant correlations with the DASS-21 in the disability population and the K10 in the typically developing population. Conclusions and implications: This brief, easily administered, five-item scale demonstrates strong potential in assessing parental adjustment, within both parents of typically developing children and parents of children with developmental and/or intellectual disabilities.
AB - Background: Explores the validity of the five-item parental adjustment scale, a subscale of the previously validated Parenting and Family Adjustment Scales. Aim: The aim was to assess the factor structure and convergent validity of a measure of parental adjustment within parents of typically developing children and parents of children with developmental and/or intellectual disabilities. Methods and procedures: Cross-sectional survey data was analysed from Australian parents of children aged 2-12 years who were typically developing children (N = 683) and had developmental and/or intellectual disabilities (N = 756). Confirmatory factor analyses and multi-group structural equation modelling examined if the factor structure performed similarly across the two populations. Convergent validity was assessed. Outcomes and results: The confirmatory factor analysis supported the hypothesised one-factor structure for the parental adjustment scale in both populations. Partial measurement invariance confirmed that the scale was structurally consistent within both parent groups. The convergent validity was supported by significant correlations with the DASS-21 in the disability population and the K10 in the typically developing population. Conclusions and implications: This brief, easily administered, five-item scale demonstrates strong potential in assessing parental adjustment, within both parents of typically developing children and parents of children with developmental and/or intellectual disabilities.
KW - Disability
KW - Measurement invariance
KW - Parental adjustment
KW - Validation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85134602711&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://purl.org/au-research/grants/NHMRC/1016919
U2 - 10.1016/j.ridd.2022.104304
DO - 10.1016/j.ridd.2022.104304
M3 - Article
C2 - 35820264
AN - SCOPUS:85134602711
SN - 0891-4222
VL - 128
JO - Research in Developmental Disabilities
JF - Research in Developmental Disabilities
M1 - 104304
ER -