Performance of a mobile single-lead electrocardiogram technology for atrial fibrillation screening in a semirural African population: Insights from “The heart of Ethiopia: Focus on atrial fibrillation” (TEFF-AF) study

Bradley M Pitman, Sok-Hui Chew, Christopher X Wong, Amenah Jaghoori, Shinsuke Iwai, Gijo Thomas, Andrew Chew, Prashanthan Sanders, Dennis H Lau

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

7 Citations (Scopus)
7 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) screening using mobile single-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) devices has demonstrated variable sensitivity and specificity. However, limited data exists on the use of such devices in low-resource countries. 

Objective: The goal of the research was to evaluate the utility of the KardiaMobile device's (AliveCor Inc) automated algorithm for AF screening in a semirural Ethiopian population. 

Methods: Analysis was performed on 30-second single-lead ECG tracings obtained using the KardiaMobile device from 1500 TEFF-AF (The Heart of Ethiopia: Focus on Atrial Fibrillation) study participants. We evaluated the performance of the KardiaMobile automated algorithm against cardiologists' interpretations of 30-second single-lead ECG for AF screening. 

Results: A total of 1709 single-lead ECG tracings (including repeat tracing on 209 occasions) were analyzed from 1500 Ethiopians (63.53% [953/1500] male, mean age 35 [SD 13] years) who presented for AF screening. Initial successful rhythm decision (normal or possible AF) with one single-lead ECG tracing was lower with the KardiaMobile automated algorithm versus manual verification by cardiologists (1176/1500, 78.40%, vs 1455/1500, 97.00%; P<.001). Repeat single-lead ECG tracings in 209 individuals improved overall rhythm decision, but the KardiaMobile automated algorithm remained inferior (1301/1500, 86.73%, vs 1479/1500, 98.60%; P<.001). The key reasons underlying unsuccessful KardiaMobile automated rhythm determination include poor quality/noisy tracings (214/408, 52.45%), frequent ectopy (22/408, 5.39%), and tachycardia (>100 bpm; 167/408, 40.93%). The sensitivity and specificity of rhythm decision using KardiaMobile automated algorithm were 80.27% (1168/1455) and 82.22% (37/45), respectively. 

Conclusions: The performance of the KardiaMobile automated algorithm was suboptimal when used for AF screening. However, the KardiaMobile single-lead ECG device remains an excellent AF screening tool with appropriate clinician input and repeat tracing.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere24470
Number of pages10
JournalJMIR mHealth and uHealth
Volume9
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2021

Keywords

  • Atrial fibrillation
  • Screening
  • Single-lead ECG
  • Sub-Saharan Africa

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Performance of a mobile single-lead electrocardiogram technology for atrial fibrillation screening in a semirural African population: Insights from “The heart of Ethiopia: Focus on atrial fibrillation” (TEFF-AF) study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this