"Perhaps everyone has forgotten just how pictures are shown to the public": Continuous performance and double billing in the 1930s

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

Abstract

In April 1934, in an editorial article in the Motion Picture Herald, its publisher Martin Quigley denounced “a vastly destructive practice which has long been tolerated” in the motion picture industry. Quigley was at the time embroiled in negotiations between the major companies and the hierarchy of the Catholic Church over the stage management of the Legion of Decency’s public campaign against indecency in the movies, but that issue was not his immediate concern. Instead, the destructive practice of which he complained was the arrangement under which a great part of all theatre audiences are allowed—or compelled—to see pictures not from the start but from some medium point on to the end and then, after viewing intervening material, are returned to observe the opening scenes.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationThe Routledge Companion to New Cinema History
EditorsDaniel Biltereyst, Richard Maltby, Philippe Meers
Place of PublicationOxon, UK
PublisherRoutledge, Taylor & Francis
Chapter13
Pages159-172
Number of pages14
ISBN (Electronic)9781315666051
ISBN (Print)9781138955844
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Keywords

  • cinema
  • history
  • movie
  • Motion Picture
  • stage management
  • theatre audiences

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '"Perhaps everyone has forgotten just how pictures are shown to the public": Continuous performance and double billing in the 1930s'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this