Perpetuating the problem: neoliberalism, commonwealth public policy and housing affordability in Australia: Neoliberalism, commonwealth public policy and housing affordability in Australia: Neoliberalism

Seth Nicholls

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    10 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This paper argues that the scale of the contemporary housing affordability crisis in Australia is at least partly attributable to the influence of neoliberal ideas over the past three decades. After providing an overview of the nature and scope of the crisis, the process by which housing as a policy problem has been reconceptualised by policy makers and others since the 1970s is examined. This is followed by analysis of the ways in which a number of commonwealth government policies which are ideationally underpinned by neoliberalism have amplified and perpetuated the problem of housing affordability in Australia and, ipso facto, prevented the issue from being addressed. The paper concludes by suggesting that policies which are ostensibly intended to improve housing affordability will continue to founder until the ideational obstacles which are the focus of this paper are recognised, and housing policy is reconceptualised along lines more conducive to the amelioration of the housing affordability problem. The paper seeks to extend the existing literature on housing affordability by explicitly identifying the linkages between neoliberal ideas, commonwealth public policy, and the extant problem of housing affordability in Australia.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)329-347
    Number of pages19
    JournalAustralian Journal of Social Issues
    Volume49
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusAccepted/In press - 2014

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Perpetuating the problem: neoliberalism, commonwealth public policy and housing affordability in Australia: Neoliberalism, commonwealth public policy and housing affordability in Australia: Neoliberalism'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this