Philosophical and Logic-Based Argumentation-Driven Reasoning Approaches and their Realization on the WWW: A Survey

Naeem Khalid Janjua, Omar Khadeer Hussain, Farookh Khadeer Hussain, Elizabeth Chang

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Argumentation is the practice of systematic conscious reasoning involving the construction and evaluation of arguments to justify or support a particular conclusion. This article discusses, compares, contrasts and categorizes existing argumentation-based frameworks and applications as either philosophical or logic-based, and provides critical analysis that emphasizes the structure of arguments and the interactions between them. This review compares and contrasts the frameworks and applications of argumentation-based approaches on Web 2.0 and the Semantic Web, and subsequently highlights the importance and challenges of attaining monological argumentation on the Semantic Web.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1967-1999
Number of pages33
JournalComputer Journal
Volume58
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2015
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2014 The British Computer Society. All rights reserved.

Keywords

  • argumentation
  • dialogical argumentation
  • logic programming
  • monological argumentation
  • Semantic Web
  • WWW technologies

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Philosophical and Logic-Based Argumentation-Driven Reasoning Approaches and their Realization on the WWW: A Survey'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this