TY - JOUR
T1 - Physical and monetary ecosystem service accounts for Europe
T2 - A case study for in-stream nitrogen retention
AU - La Notte, Alessandra
AU - Maes, Joachim
AU - Dalmazzone, Silvana
AU - Crossman, Neville D.
AU - Grizzetti, Bruna
AU - Bidoglio, Giovanni
PY - 2017/2
Y1 - 2017/2
N2 - In this paper we present a case study of integrated ecosystem and economic accounting based on the System of Environmental Economic Accounting — Experimental Ecosystem Accounts (SEEA-EEA). We develop accounts, in physical and monetary terms, for the water purification ecosystem service in Europe over a 20-year time period (1985–2005). The estimation of nitrogen retention is based on the GREEN biophysical model, within which we impose a sustainability threshold to obtain the physical indicators of capacity – the ability of an ecosystem to sustainably supply ecosystem services. Key messages of our paper pertain the notion of capacity, operationalized in accounting terms with reference to individual ecosystem services rather than to the ecosystem as a whole, and intended as the stock that provides the sustainable flow of the service. The study clarifies the difference between sustainable flow and actual flow of the service, which should be calculated jointly so as to enable an assessment of the sustainability of current use of ecosystem services. Finally, by distinguishing the notion of ‘process’ (referred to the ecosystem) from that of ‘capacity’ (pertaining specific services) and proposing a methodology to calculate capacity and flow, we suggest an implementable way to operationalize the SEEA-EEA accounts.
AB - In this paper we present a case study of integrated ecosystem and economic accounting based on the System of Environmental Economic Accounting — Experimental Ecosystem Accounts (SEEA-EEA). We develop accounts, in physical and monetary terms, for the water purification ecosystem service in Europe over a 20-year time period (1985–2005). The estimation of nitrogen retention is based on the GREEN biophysical model, within which we impose a sustainability threshold to obtain the physical indicators of capacity – the ability of an ecosystem to sustainably supply ecosystem services. Key messages of our paper pertain the notion of capacity, operationalized in accounting terms with reference to individual ecosystem services rather than to the ecosystem as a whole, and intended as the stock that provides the sustainable flow of the service. The study clarifies the difference between sustainable flow and actual flow of the service, which should be calculated jointly so as to enable an assessment of the sustainability of current use of ecosystem services. Finally, by distinguishing the notion of ‘process’ (referred to the ecosystem) from that of ‘capacity’ (pertaining specific services) and proposing a methodology to calculate capacity and flow, we suggest an implementable way to operationalize the SEEA-EEA accounts.
KW - Actual flow
KW - Capacity
KW - Ecosystem accounting
KW - Ecosystem services
KW - Sustainable flow
KW - Water purification
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84999851916&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.11.002
DO - 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.11.002
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84999851916
SN - 2212-0416
VL - 23
SP - 18
EP - 29
JO - Ecosystem Services
JF - Ecosystem Services
ER -