Abstract
The non-identity problem arises when an intervention or behavior changes the identity of those affected. Delaying pregnancy is an example of such a behavior. The problem is whether and in what ways such changes in identity affect moral considerations. While a great deal has been written about the non-identity problem, relatively little has been written about the implications for physicians and how they should understand their duties. We argue that the non-identity problem can make a crucial moral difference in some circumstances, and that it has some interesting implications for when it is or is not right for a physician to refuse to accede to a patient's request. If a physician is asked to provide an intervention (identity preserving) that makes a person worse off, then such harm provides a good reason for the physician to refuse to provide the intervention. However, in cases where different (identity-altering) interventions result in different people having a better or worse life, physicians should normally respect patient choice.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 21-29 |
| Number of pages | 9 |
| Journal | American Journal of Bioethics |
| Volume | 12 |
| Issue number | 8 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jul 2012 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- disability
- doctors
- duty
- harm
- identity
- non-identity problem
- physicians
- reproductive choice
- wrongful life
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Physicians duties and the non-identity problem'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver