TY - JOUR
T1 - Positive and negative urgency as a single coherent construct
T2 - Evidence from a large-scale network analysis in clinical and non-clinical samples
AU - Billieux, Joël
AU - Heeren, Alexandre
AU - Rochat, Lucien
AU - Maurage, Pierre
AU - Bayard, Sophie
AU - Bet, Romain
AU - Besche-Richard, Chrystel
AU - Challet-Bouju, Gaëlle
AU - Carré, Arnaud
AU - Devos, Gaëtan
AU - Flayelle, Maèva
AU - Gierski, Fabien
AU - Grall-Bronnec, Marie
AU - Kern, Laurence
AU - Khazaal, Yasser
AU - Lançon, Christophe
AU - Lannoy, Séverine
AU - Michael, George A.
AU - Raffard, Stéphane
AU - Romo, Lucia
AU - Van der Linden, Martial
AU - Wéry, Aline
AU - Canale, Natale
AU - King, Daniel L.
AU - Schimmenti, Adriano
AU - Baggio, Stéphanie
PY - 2021/12
Y1 - 2021/12
N2 - Aims: Negative and positive urgency are emotion-related impulsivity traits that are thought to be transdiagnostic factors in psychopathology. However, it has recently been claimed that these two traits are closely related to each other and that considering them separately might have limited conceptual and methodological value. The present study aimed to examine whether positive and negative urgency constructs constitute separate impulsivity traits. Methods: In contrast to previous studies that have used latent variable approaches, this study employed an item-based network analysis conducted in two different samples: a large sample of non-clinical participants (N = 18,568) and a sample of clinical participants with psychiatric disorders (N = 385). Results: The network analysis demonstrated that items denoting both positive and negative urgency cohere as a single cluster of items termed “general urgency” in both clinical and non-clinical samples, thereby suggesting that differentiating positive and negative urgency as separate constructs is not necessary. Conclusion: These findings have important implications for the conceptualization and assessment of urgency and, more broadly, for future research on impulsivity, personality, and psychopathology.
AB - Aims: Negative and positive urgency are emotion-related impulsivity traits that are thought to be transdiagnostic factors in psychopathology. However, it has recently been claimed that these two traits are closely related to each other and that considering them separately might have limited conceptual and methodological value. The present study aimed to examine whether positive and negative urgency constructs constitute separate impulsivity traits. Methods: In contrast to previous studies that have used latent variable approaches, this study employed an item-based network analysis conducted in two different samples: a large sample of non-clinical participants (N = 18,568) and a sample of clinical participants with psychiatric disorders (N = 385). Results: The network analysis demonstrated that items denoting both positive and negative urgency cohere as a single cluster of items termed “general urgency” in both clinical and non-clinical samples, thereby suggesting that differentiating positive and negative urgency as separate constructs is not necessary. Conclusion: These findings have important implications for the conceptualization and assessment of urgency and, more broadly, for future research on impulsivity, personality, and psychopathology.
KW - impulsivity
KW - negative urgency
KW - network analysis
KW - positive urgency
KW - UPPS
KW - urgency
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85118479564&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/jopy.12655
DO - 10.1111/jopy.12655
M3 - Article
C2 - 34114654
AN - SCOPUS:85118479564
VL - 89
SP - 1252
EP - 1262
JO - European Journal of Personality
JF - European Journal of Personality
SN - 0890-2070
IS - 6
ER -