Posthumous conception by presumed consent. A pragmatic position for a rare but ethically challenging dilemma

Kelton Tremellen, Julian Savulescu

    Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

    4 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    The prevailing legal position and opinion of professional societies such as the European Society for Human Reproduction and Embryology and the American Society for Reproductive Medicine is that posthumous sperm conception should only occur in the presence of explicit written consent from the deceased man. However, in our opinion this is an impractical approach as the majority of deaths of reproductive-age men are sudden and unexpected, thereby precluding explicit consent. Previously in this journal we have outlined arguments supporting a move to a standard of presumed consent for posthumous conception, with provisions for men to ‘opt out’ and safeguards to protect the welfare of the prospective mother and her child. In a recent commentary in this journal, Kroon outlines arguments against our position of presumed consent as an unacceptable violation of the deceased's autonomy. However, such arguments on the primacy of the rights of the dead are in our opinion not paramount, especially since this position blocks access to posthumous conception for the majority who support its use. The objective of this commentary is to provide a rebuttal to the concerns raised by Kroon and hopefully reorientate the discussion towards the rights and welfare of the living (widow, prospective child), not the dead.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)26-29
    Number of pages4
    JournalReproductive Biomedicine and Society Online
    Volume3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2016

    Keywords

    • autonomy
    • consent
    • ethics
    • posthumous conception
    • sperm
    • welfare

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Posthumous conception by presumed consent. A pragmatic position for a rare but ethically challenging dilemma'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this