Precarious employment, psychosocial working conditions and health: Cross-sectional associations in a population-based sample of working Australians

Dominic Keuskamp, Anna Ziersch, Frances Baum, Anthony LaMontagne

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    16 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Background: Precarious employment has been associated with poor health, but the potential mechanisms are unclear. We examined the relationships between precarious employment and health, and investigated psychosocial working conditions as potential mediators. Methods: A cross-sectional population-based survey was conducted in South Australia in 2009 (N=1,016 employed). SF-12 measures of mental and physical health were modeled using logistic regression in relation to employment arrangement, controlling for socio-demographics, years in job and psychosocial working conditions. Results: There was no association between casual full-time or part-time employment and poor mental health in multivariate analyses. Conversely, there was a significant association between casual full-time employment and poor physical health (compared to permanent full-time workers, OR=3.14, 95% CI 1.26-7.85). The association with physical health was unaffected by adjustment for psychosocial working conditions. Conclusions: Casual full-time employment was strongly associated with poor physical health but not with poor mental health. This association was not mediated by the psychosocial working conditions measured in this study, but may be related to other (unmeasured) working conditions.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)838-844
    Number of pages7
    JournalAmerican Journal of Industrial Medicine
    Volume56
    Issue number8
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Aug 2013

    Keywords

    • Casual
    • Employment
    • Health
    • Precarious
    • Psychosocial

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Precarious employment, psychosocial working conditions and health: Cross-sectional associations in a population-based sample of working Australians'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this