Predictors of malignancy in screen-detected breast masses with indeterminate/equivocal (grade 3) imaging features

Gelareh Farshid, Adrienne Walker, Glenda Battersby, Thomas Sullivan, Peter Gill, Steven Pieterse, Peter Downey

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    1 Citation (Scopus)


    Background: The mammographic grading system used by BreastScreen Australia accredited programs requires needle biopsy of lesions with indeterminate features (grade 3). We wished to determine the predictors of malignancy for these common lesions, so as to reduce surgery for benign lesions. Design: Grade 3 masses assessed between Jan 1996-Dec 2005 are included. New or changing lesions were identified through film review. Imaging, demographic and final outcome data were tabulated. Statistical analysis was performed to determine the predictors of malignancy. Results: 1181 lesions, including 623 new or changing masses are assessed. Of these 98 (8.3%) were malignant. Malignancy was found in 3% first round masses versus 13% of new or changing lesions. Withholding needle biopsy results, interval change (OR 2.85, p = 0.0001), increasing age (p = 0.0001) and diameter were independent predictors of malignancy, lesion diameter having an inverse relationship with malignancy.Once needle biopsy results were included, this parameter became the sole predictor of malignancy as other factors lost significance in a multivariate model. Conclusion: Surgical biopsy is not indicated in well-sampled grade 3 masses with benign needle biopsy results. Surgery is valuable for diagnosis or treatment of the remaining such masses without benign needle biopsy results.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)56-61
    Number of pages6
    Issue number1
    Publication statusPublished - Feb 2011


    • Biopsy
    • Breast
    • Mammography
    • Screening


    Dive into the research topics of 'Predictors of malignancy in screen-detected breast masses with indeterminate/equivocal (grade 3) imaging features'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this