Preferences for Palliative and End-of-Life Care: A Systematic Review of Discrete Choice Experiments

Qing Xia, Mineth Kularatna, Claudia Virdun, Elise Button, Eliana Close, Hannah E. Carter

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

21 Citations (Scopus)
26 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Objectives: Understanding what matters most to patients and their caregivers is fundamental to delivering high-quality care. This systematic review aimed to characterize and appraise the evidence from discrete choice experiments eliciting preferences for palliative care. 

Methods: A systematic literature search was undertaken for publications up until August 2022. Data were synthesized narratively. Thematic analysis was applied to categorize attributes into groups. Attribute development, frequency, and relative importance were analyzed. Subgroup analyses were conducted to compare outcomes between patient and proxy respondents. 

Results: Seventeen studies spanning 11 countries were included; 59% of studies solely considered preferences for patients with cancer. A range of respondent groups were represented including patients (76%) and proxies (caregivers [35%], health providers [12%], and the public [18%]). A total of 117 individual attributes were extracted and thematically grouped into 8 broad categories and 21 subcategories. Clinical outcomes including quality of life, length of life, and pain control were the most frequently reported attributes, whereas attributes relating to psychosocial components were largely absent. Both patients and proxy respondents prioritized pain control over additional survival time. Nevertheless, there were differences between respondent cohorts in the emphasis on other attributes such as access to care, timely information, and low risk of adverse effects (prioritized by patients), as opposed to cost, quality, and delivery of care (prioritized by proxies). 

Conclusions: Our review underscores the vital role of pain control in palliative care; in addition, it shed light on the complexity and relative strength of preferences for various aspects of care from multiple perspectives, which is useful in developing personalized, patient-centered models of care for individuals nearing the end of life.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1795-1809
Number of pages15
JournalValue in Health
Volume26
Issue number12
Early online date3 Aug 2023
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2023
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • discrete choice experiments
  • palliative care
  • relative attribute importance
  • systematic review
  • trade-offs

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Preferences for Palliative and End-of-Life Care: A Systematic Review of Discrete Choice Experiments'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this