TY - JOUR
T1 - Primary Gleason grade and Gleason grade group at positive surgical margins
T2 - a systematic review and meta-analysis
AU - John, Athul
AU - John, Hritik
AU - Catterwell, Rick
AU - Selth, Luke A.
AU - Callaghan, Michael O.
PY - 2021/5
Y1 - 2021/5
N2 - Objectives: To systematically review and perform a meta-analysis of studies investigating the role of primary Gleason grade (PGG), Gleason score (GS) or Gleason grade group (GGG) at positive surgical margins (PSMs) after radical prostatectomy (RP) in predicting biochemical recurrence (BCR) and oncological outcomes. Methods: A systematic search was conducted using the MEDLINE, Scopus, Embase and Cochrane databases according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies published between 2005 and 2019 were included. The quality of the studies selected was assessed, and a protocol was registered and published in advance (PROSPERO: CRD42019131800). The primary outcome measure was BCR. Secondary outcome measures included cancer-specific survival, metastasis-free survival and overall mortality during the follow-up period. Results: Our systematic search yielded 3116 unique results. Ten studies were selected for meta-analysis. The sample sizes of PSM cohorts varied from 200 to 956, while the median follow-up ranged from 1.5 to 13 years. Most studies used BCR as a surrogate marker for disease progression; only two studies reported other oncological outcomes. Meta-analysis was performed in selected groups (PGG, GS and GGG). PGG 4 or 5 at the PSM was found to be predictive of BCR (hazard ratio [HR] 1.66, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.37–2.02; P < 0.01). GGG > 1 at margin was also predictive of BCR compared to GGG 1 (GGG 1 vs 2: HR 2.35, 95% CI 1.6 −3.46; P < 0.001; GGG 1 vs 3: HR 3.95, 95% CI 1.82–8.57; P = 0.005; GGG 1 vs 4: HR 7.17, 95% CI 1.76–29.17; P = 0.006; and GGG 1 vs 5: HR 12.37, 95% CI 1.80–84.82; P = 0.01). Conclusion: Gleason score, PGG and GGG at the PSM are associated with a significantly increased risk of BCR. Longer-term studies are needed to investigate the utility of PGG, GS or GGG at the PSM in their ability to predict not only BCR but other outcomes such as cancer-specific survival, metastasis-free survival and overall survival.
AB - Objectives: To systematically review and perform a meta-analysis of studies investigating the role of primary Gleason grade (PGG), Gleason score (GS) or Gleason grade group (GGG) at positive surgical margins (PSMs) after radical prostatectomy (RP) in predicting biochemical recurrence (BCR) and oncological outcomes. Methods: A systematic search was conducted using the MEDLINE, Scopus, Embase and Cochrane databases according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies published between 2005 and 2019 were included. The quality of the studies selected was assessed, and a protocol was registered and published in advance (PROSPERO: CRD42019131800). The primary outcome measure was BCR. Secondary outcome measures included cancer-specific survival, metastasis-free survival and overall mortality during the follow-up period. Results: Our systematic search yielded 3116 unique results. Ten studies were selected for meta-analysis. The sample sizes of PSM cohorts varied from 200 to 956, while the median follow-up ranged from 1.5 to 13 years. Most studies used BCR as a surrogate marker for disease progression; only two studies reported other oncological outcomes. Meta-analysis was performed in selected groups (PGG, GS and GGG). PGG 4 or 5 at the PSM was found to be predictive of BCR (hazard ratio [HR] 1.66, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.37–2.02; P < 0.01). GGG > 1 at margin was also predictive of BCR compared to GGG 1 (GGG 1 vs 2: HR 2.35, 95% CI 1.6 −3.46; P < 0.001; GGG 1 vs 3: HR 3.95, 95% CI 1.82–8.57; P = 0.005; GGG 1 vs 4: HR 7.17, 95% CI 1.76–29.17; P = 0.006; and GGG 1 vs 5: HR 12.37, 95% CI 1.80–84.82; P = 0.01). Conclusion: Gleason score, PGG and GGG at the PSM are associated with a significantly increased risk of BCR. Longer-term studies are needed to investigate the utility of PGG, GS or GGG at the PSM in their ability to predict not only BCR but other outcomes such as cancer-specific survival, metastasis-free survival and overall survival.
KW - #PCSM
KW - #ProstateCancer
KW - #uroonc
KW - biochemical recurrence
KW - Gleason
KW - Gleason grade group
KW - positive surgical margin
KW - prostate cancer
KW - prostatectomy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85105525819&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/bju.15316
DO - 10.1111/bju.15316
M3 - Review article
C2 - 33973331
AN - SCOPUS:85105525819
SN - 1464-4096
VL - 127
SP - 13
EP - 22
JO - British Journal of Urology International
JF - British Journal of Urology International
IS - S1
ER -