Procedural Delay in the Developing Middle East

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


    In this article, I explore whether and how Middle Eastern legal process can be reconciled with the idea of timeliness. The idea that any procedure physically within the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) and Middle East and North Africa (MENA) regions could be both fair and expeditious may appear counterintuitive to those brought up in the Anglo-American legal tradition, and the suggestion that there could exist a notion of "timely Middle Eastern procedure" that produced just and fair results is more than likely to be treated as an oxymoron. Administrative, political and legal processes throughout the Levant and Arab world are, when viewed through Western eyes, more than likely to be characterised as corrupt, slow or even Kafkaesque. I argue that procedural delay is an inherently problematic and relative concept, both legally and culturally speaking, which cannot make sense without introducing robust time standards against which court processing time can be evaluated. I seek to elucidate the fundamental nature and causes of procedural delay in relation to civil trials and propose the adoption of a distinct methodology that could be used to more objectively assess court efficiency in handling civil cases throughout the GCC and MENA regions.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)97-125
    Number of pages29
    JournalThe Law and Development Review
    Issue number1
    Publication statusPublished - 2018


    • Law and Development in Middle East
    • Middle Eastern legal process
    • Procedural Delay


    Dive into the research topics of 'Procedural Delay in the Developing Middle East'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this