Promoting Wellbeing among Family Medicine Trainees: A Hermeneutic Review of Intervention Mechanisms of Change and their Delivery Methods

Phenomenon: Efforts to promote wellbeing and reduce burnout amongst postgraduate medical trainees have been hampered by little consideration of interventions’ underlying mechanisms, as well as how interventions are delivered. The critical role of trainee specialty has also been overlooked, despite the unique personal and work-based stressors faced among subgroups–such as those completing Family Medicine/General Practice. A consolidation of intervention research can help to guide the design, implementation and evaluation of future targeted programs and potentially enhance their effectiveness. The present hermeneutic literature review addresses this gap. Approach: The Embase, Ovid Medline, and Ovid PsycINFO databases were searched for articles exploring wellbeing and related concepts of burnout and stress amongst Family Medicine/General Practice trainees. Thirty-one studies were identified through seven iterative rounds, with articles that offered novel insights and/or addressed knowledge gaps identified in each round and analyzed, followed by refinement of the overarching coding structure. Thematic analysis was conducted by two researchers. Findings: Proposed and enacted wellbeing interventions typically involved a combination of individualistic (e.g., self-awareness), organizational (e.g., increasing policy flexibility), and cultural (e.g., leadership) strategies. Change mechanisms were interpersonal (e.g., comradery) and, to a greater extent, intrapersonal (e.g., normalizing and accepting feelings of insecurity). Key delivery methods included the need to ingrain trainee wellness into daily work life and the importance of contextualizing interventions to increase their relevance, acceptance, and effectiveness. Insights: The present review identifies and consolidates key mechanisms of change intrinsic to wellbeing-promotion interventions, alongside delivery methods. These findings provide guidance for practice and research to identify these attributes of interventions in the design and evaluation stages. This, in turn, will enhance the clarity of what is being evaluated, facilitating more informed comparisons between evaluations.