Abstract
This article considers policy making in practice focussing on case studies drawn from ethnographic research on prostitution in Indonesia carried out between 2012 and 2013 (this article is based on field research undertaken in Java, Indonesia, between November 2012 and 28 February 2013). Its theoretical underpinnings is that of ‘critical systemic heuristics’ which contends that policy making with respect to prostitution needs to take into account a range of factors and diverse views based on a process of ‘unfolding values’ and ‘sweeping in’ many variables before a decision is made. Applying ‘critical systemic approach’ or ‘critical heuristics’provides a means to test out the policy making ideas, as opposed to merely implementing the ideas of the powerful. The paper applies critical heuristic thinking to argue that the policy response ought to take into account the voices of those with a lived experience of poverty and prostitution, in order to protect their rights when making policy decisions.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 213-237 |
| Number of pages | 25 |
| Journal | Systemic Practice and Action Research |
| Volume | 30 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Jun 2017 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 1 No Poverty
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- Critical system heuristic
- Expanded pragmatism
- Policy
- Prostitution
- Rights
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Prostitution and Human Rights in Indonesia: A Critical Systemic Review of Policy Discourses and Scenarios'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver