TY - JOUR
T1 - Psychotherapies for eating disorders
T2 - findings from a rapid review
AU - Russell, Haley
AU - Aouad, Phillip
AU - Le, Anvi
AU - Marks, Peta
AU - Maloney, Danielle
AU - National Eating Disorder Research Consortium
AU - Barakat, Sarah
AU - Boakes, Robert
AU - Brennan, Leah
AU - Bryant, Emma
AU - Byrne, Susan
AU - Caldwell, Belinda
AU - Calvert, Shannon
AU - Carroll, Bronny
AU - Castle, David
AU - Caterson, Ian
AU - Chelius, Belinda
AU - Chiem, Lyn
AU - Clarke, Simon
AU - Conti, Janet
AU - Crouch, Lexi
AU - Dammery, Genevieve
AU - Dzajkovski, Natasha
AU - Fardouly, Jasmine
AU - Feneley, John
AU - Foroughi, Nasim
AU - Fuller-Tyszkiewicz, Mathew
AU - Fursland, Anthea
AU - Gonzalez-Arce, Veronica
AU - Gouldthorp, Bethanie
AU - Griffin, Kelly
AU - Griffiths, Scott
AU - Hambleton, Ashlea
AU - Hannigan, Amy
AU - Hart, Mel
AU - Hart, Susan
AU - Hay, Phillipa
AU - Hickie, Ian
AU - Kay-Lambkin, Francis
AU - King, Ross
AU - Kohn, Michael
AU - Koreshe, Eyza
AU - Krug, Isabel
AU - Linardon, Jake
AU - Long, Randall
AU - Long, Amanda
AU - Madden, Sloane
AU - McLean, Siân
AU - Meddick, Thy
AU - Miskovic-Wheatley, Jane
AU - Mitchison, Deborah
AU - O’Kearney, Richard
AU - Ong, Shu Hwa
AU - Paterson, Roger
AU - Paxton, Susan
AU - Pehlivan, Melissa
AU - Pepin, Genevieve
AU - Phillipou, Andrea
AU - Piccone, Judith
AU - Pinkus, Rebecca
AU - Raykos, Bronwyn
AU - Rhodes, Paul
AU - Rieger, Elizabeth
AU - Rockett, Karen
AU - Rodan, Sarah
AU - Russell, Janice
AU - Salter, Fiona
AU - Sawyer, Susan
AU - Shelton, Beth
AU - Singh, Urvashnee
AU - Smith, Sophie
AU - Smith, Evelyn
AU - Spielman, Karen
AU - Squire, Sarah
AU - Thomson, Juliette
AU - Tiggemann, Marika
AU - Utpala, Ranjani
AU - Vartanian, Lenny
AU - Vatter, Sabina
AU - Wallis, Andrew
AU - Ward, Warren
AU - Wells, Sarah
AU - Wertheim, Eleanor
AU - Wilksch, Simon
AU - Williams, Michelle
AU - Touyz, Stephen
AU - Maguire, Sarah
PY - 2023/10/4
Y1 - 2023/10/4
N2 - Background: Psychotherapy is considered central to the effective treatment of eating disorders—focusing on behavioural, psychological, and social factors that contribute to the illness. Research indicates psychotherapeutic interventions out-perform placebo, waitlist, and/or other treatments; but, outcomes vary with room for major improvement. Thus, this review aims to (1) establish and consolidate knowledge on efficacious eating disorder psychotherapies; (2) highlight select emerging psychotherapeutic interventions; and (3) identify knowledge gaps to better inform future treatment research and development. Methods: The current review forms part of a series of Rapid Reviews published in a special issue in the Journal of Eating Disorders to inform the development of the Australian-government-funded National Eating Disorder Research and Translation Strategy 2021–2031. Three databases were searched for studies published between 2009 and 2023, published in English, and comprising high-level evidence studies (meta-analyses, systematic reviews, moderately sized randomised controlled studies, moderately sized controlled-cohort studies, and population studies). Data pertaining to psychotherapies for eating disorders were synthesised and outlined in the current paper. Results: 281 studies met inclusion criteria. Behavioural therapies were most commonly studied, with cognitive-behavioural and family-based therapies being the most researched; and thus, having the largest evidence-base for treating anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, and binge eating disorder. Other therapies, such as interpersonal and dialectical behaviour therapies also demonstrated positive treatment outcomes. Emerging evidence supports specific use of Acceptance and Commitment; Integrative Cognitive Affective; Exposure; Mindfulness; and Emotionally-Focused therapies; however further research is needed to determine their efficacy. Similarly, growing support for self-help, group, and computer/internet-based therapeutic modalities was noted. Psychotherapies for avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder; other, and unspecified feeding and eating disorders were lacking evidence. Conclusions: Currently, clinical practice is largely supported by research indicating that behavioural and cognitive-behavioural psychotherapies are most effective for the treatment of eating disorders. However, the efficacy of psychotherapeutic interventions varies across studies, highlighting the need for investment and expansion of research into enhanced variants and novel psychotherapies to improve illness outcomes. There is also a pressing need for investigation into the whole range of eating disorder presentations and populations, to determine the most effective interventions.
AB - Background: Psychotherapy is considered central to the effective treatment of eating disorders—focusing on behavioural, psychological, and social factors that contribute to the illness. Research indicates psychotherapeutic interventions out-perform placebo, waitlist, and/or other treatments; but, outcomes vary with room for major improvement. Thus, this review aims to (1) establish and consolidate knowledge on efficacious eating disorder psychotherapies; (2) highlight select emerging psychotherapeutic interventions; and (3) identify knowledge gaps to better inform future treatment research and development. Methods: The current review forms part of a series of Rapid Reviews published in a special issue in the Journal of Eating Disorders to inform the development of the Australian-government-funded National Eating Disorder Research and Translation Strategy 2021–2031. Three databases were searched for studies published between 2009 and 2023, published in English, and comprising high-level evidence studies (meta-analyses, systematic reviews, moderately sized randomised controlled studies, moderately sized controlled-cohort studies, and population studies). Data pertaining to psychotherapies for eating disorders were synthesised and outlined in the current paper. Results: 281 studies met inclusion criteria. Behavioural therapies were most commonly studied, with cognitive-behavioural and family-based therapies being the most researched; and thus, having the largest evidence-base for treating anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, and binge eating disorder. Other therapies, such as interpersonal and dialectical behaviour therapies also demonstrated positive treatment outcomes. Emerging evidence supports specific use of Acceptance and Commitment; Integrative Cognitive Affective; Exposure; Mindfulness; and Emotionally-Focused therapies; however further research is needed to determine their efficacy. Similarly, growing support for self-help, group, and computer/internet-based therapeutic modalities was noted. Psychotherapies for avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder; other, and unspecified feeding and eating disorders were lacking evidence. Conclusions: Currently, clinical practice is largely supported by research indicating that behavioural and cognitive-behavioural psychotherapies are most effective for the treatment of eating disorders. However, the efficacy of psychotherapeutic interventions varies across studies, highlighting the need for investment and expansion of research into enhanced variants and novel psychotherapies to improve illness outcomes. There is also a pressing need for investigation into the whole range of eating disorder presentations and populations, to determine the most effective interventions.
KW - Behavioural therapies cognitive behavioural therapy
KW - Dialectical behavioural therapy
KW - Eating disorders
KW - Family-based therapy
KW - Intervention
KW - Psychotherapies
KW - Therapies
KW - Treatment
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85173791614&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/s40337-023-00886-w
DO - 10.1186/s40337-023-00886-w
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85173791614
SN - 2050-2974
VL - 11
JO - Journal of Eating Disorders
JF - Journal of Eating Disorders
IS - 1
M1 - 175
ER -