Qualitative Research in CKD: How to Appraise and Interpret the Evidence

Amanda Baumgart, Jonathan C. Craig, Allison Tong

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The value of patient-centered care, research, and policy is now widely recognized. This approach requires an in-depth understanding of the beliefs, values, and experiences of patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and their families, which may not always be conveyed in clinical settings.1 Qualitative research can generate detailed evidence on people’s priorities, goals, and needs to change practice and policy.1, 2, 3

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)538-541
Number of pages4
JournalAmerican Journal of Kidney Diseases
Volume77
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2021

Keywords

  • Robinson Fellowship
  • chronic kidney disease (CKD)
  • Interpreting the Evidence
  • emergency-only hemodialysis (HD)
  • peritoneal dialysis (PD)
  • Lincoln and Guba’s constructs

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Qualitative Research in CKD: How to Appraise and Interpret the Evidence'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this