Quality and costs of community-based residential supports, village communities, and residential campuses in the United Kingdom

Eric Emerson; Janet Robertson; Nicky Gregory; Chris Hatton; Sophia Kessissoglou; Angela Hallam; Martin Knapp; Krister Järbrink; Patricia Noonan Walsh; Ann Netten

doi:10.1352/0895-8017(2000)105<0081:QACOCR>2.0.CO;2

Quality and costs of community-based residential supports, village communities, and residential campuses in the United Kingdom

Eric Emerson, Janet Robertson, Nicky Gregory, Chris Hatton, Sophia Kessissoglou, Angela Hallam, Martin Knapp, Krister Järbrink, Patricia Noonan Walsh, Ann Netten

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

75 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The costs, nature, and benefits of residential supports were examined for 86 adults with mental retardation living in village communities, 133 adults living in newly built residential campuses, and 281 adults living in dispersed housing schemes (small community-based group homes and supported living). Results indicated that (a) the adjusted comprehensive costs of provision in dispersed housing schemes were 15% higher than in residential campuses and 20% higher than in village communities; (b) dispersed housing schemes and village communities offered a significantly greater quality of care than did residential campuses; and (c) there appeared to be distinct patterns of quality of life benefits associated with dispersed housing schemes and village communities, with both approaches offering a greater quality of life than did residential campuses.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	81-102
Number of pages	22
Journal	AMERICAN JOURNAL ON MENTAL RETARDATION
Volume	105
Issue number	2
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1352/0895-8017(2000)105<0081:QACOCR>2.0.CO;2
Publication status	Published - Mar 2000
Externally published	Yes

Access to Document

10.1352/0895-8017(2000)105<0081:QACOCR>2.0.CO;2Licence: In Copyright

Cite this

Emerson, E., Robertson, J., Gregory, N., Hatton, C., Kessissoglou, S., Hallam, A., Knapp, M., Järbrink, K., Walsh, P. N., & Netten, A. (2000). Quality and costs of community-based residential supports, village communities, and residential campuses in the United Kingdom. AMERICAN JOURNAL ON MENTAL RETARDATION, 105(2), 81-102. https://doi.org/10.1352/0895-8017(2000)105<0081:QACOCR>2.0.CO;2

@article{8c463c3d7c4043a0a19efb7285f35d88,

title = "Quality and costs of community-based residential supports, village communities, and residential campuses in the United Kingdom",

abstract = "The costs, nature, and benefits of residential supports were examined for 86 adults with mental retardation living in village communities, 133 adults living in newly built residential campuses, and 281 adults living in dispersed housing schemes (small community-based group homes and supported living). Results indicated that (a) the adjusted comprehensive costs of provision in dispersed housing schemes were 15% higher than in residential campuses and 20% higher than in village communities; (b) dispersed housing schemes and village communities offered a significantly greater quality of care than did residential campuses; and (c) there appeared to be distinct patterns of quality of life benefits associated with dispersed housing schemes and village communities, with both approaches offering a greater quality of life than did residential campuses.",

author = "Eric Emerson and Janet Robertson and Nicky Gregory and Chris Hatton and Sophia Kessissoglou and Angela Hallam and Martin Knapp and Krister J{\"a}rbrink and Walsh, {Patricia Noonan} and Ann Netten",

year = "2000",

month = mar,

doi = "10.1352/0895-8017(2000)105<0081:QACOCR>2.0.CO;2",

language = "English",

volume = "105",

pages = "81--102",

journal = "AMERICAN JOURNAL ON MENTAL RETARDATION",

issn = "0895-8017",

publisher = "American Association on Mental Retardation",

number = "2",

}

Emerson, E, Robertson, J, Gregory, N, Hatton, C, Kessissoglou, S, Hallam, A, Knapp, M, Järbrink, K, Walsh, PN & Netten, A 2000, 'Quality and costs of community-based residential supports, village communities, and residential campuses in the United Kingdom', AMERICAN JOURNAL ON MENTAL RETARDATION, vol. 105, no. 2, pp. 81-102. https://doi.org/10.1352/0895-8017(2000)105<0081:QACOCR>2.0.CO;2

TY - JOUR

T1 - Quality and costs of community-based residential supports, village communities, and residential campuses in the United Kingdom

AU - Emerson, Eric

AU - Robertson, Janet

AU - Gregory, Nicky

AU - Hatton, Chris

AU - Kessissoglou, Sophia

AU - Hallam, Angela

AU - Knapp, Martin

AU - Järbrink, Krister

AU - Walsh, Patricia Noonan

AU - Netten, Ann

PY - 2000/3

Y1 - 2000/3

N2 - The costs, nature, and benefits of residential supports were examined for 86 adults with mental retardation living in village communities, 133 adults living in newly built residential campuses, and 281 adults living in dispersed housing schemes (small community-based group homes and supported living). Results indicated that (a) the adjusted comprehensive costs of provision in dispersed housing schemes were 15% higher than in residential campuses and 20% higher than in village communities; (b) dispersed housing schemes and village communities offered a significantly greater quality of care than did residential campuses; and (c) there appeared to be distinct patterns of quality of life benefits associated with dispersed housing schemes and village communities, with both approaches offering a greater quality of life than did residential campuses.

AB - The costs, nature, and benefits of residential supports were examined for 86 adults with mental retardation living in village communities, 133 adults living in newly built residential campuses, and 281 adults living in dispersed housing schemes (small community-based group homes and supported living). Results indicated that (a) the adjusted comprehensive costs of provision in dispersed housing schemes were 15% higher than in residential campuses and 20% higher than in village communities; (b) dispersed housing schemes and village communities offered a significantly greater quality of care than did residential campuses; and (c) there appeared to be distinct patterns of quality of life benefits associated with dispersed housing schemes and village communities, with both approaches offering a greater quality of life than did residential campuses.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034095589&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1352/0895-8017(2000)105<0081:QACOCR>2.0.CO;2

DO - 10.1352/0895-8017(2000)105<0081:QACOCR>2.0.CO;2

M3 - Article

C2 - 10755173

AN - SCOPUS:0034095589

SN - 0895-8017

VL - 105

SP - 81

EP - 102

JO - AMERICAN JOURNAL ON MENTAL RETARDATION

JF - AMERICAN JOURNAL ON MENTAL RETARDATION

IS - 2

ER -

Quality and costs of community-based residential supports, village communities, and residential campuses in the United Kingdom

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this