TY - JOUR
T1 - Quality-of-life among head and neck cancer survivors at one year after treatment - A systematic review
AU - So, W. K.W.
AU - Chan, R. J.
AU - Chan, D. N.S.
AU - Hughes, B. G.M.
AU - Chair, S. Y.
AU - Choi, K. C.
AU - Chan, C. W.H.
PY - 2012/10
Y1 - 2012/10
N2 - Background: The importance of quality-of-life (QoL) research has been recognised over the past two decades in patients with head and neck (H&N) cancer. The aims of this systematic review are to evaluate the QoL status of H&N cancer survivors one year after treatment and to identify the determinants affecting their QoL. Methods: Pubmed, Medline, Scopus, Sciencedirect and CINAHL (2000-2011) were searched for relevant studies, and two of the present authors assessed their methodological quality. The characteristics and main findings of the studies were extracted and reported. Results: Thirty-seven studies met the inclusion criteria, and the methodological quality of the majority was moderate to high. While patients of the group in question recover their global QoL by 12 months after treatment, a number of outstanding issues persist - deterioration in physical functioning, fatigue, xerostomia and sticky saliva. Age, cancer site, stage of disease, social support, smoking, feeding tube placement and alcohol consumption are the significant determinants of QoL at 12 months, while gender has little or no influence. Conclusions: Regular assessments should be carried out to monitor physical functioning, degree of fatigue, xerostomia and sticky saliva. Further research is required to develop appropriate and effective interventions to deal with these issues, and thus to promote the patients' QoL.
AB - Background: The importance of quality-of-life (QoL) research has been recognised over the past two decades in patients with head and neck (H&N) cancer. The aims of this systematic review are to evaluate the QoL status of H&N cancer survivors one year after treatment and to identify the determinants affecting their QoL. Methods: Pubmed, Medline, Scopus, Sciencedirect and CINAHL (2000-2011) were searched for relevant studies, and two of the present authors assessed their methodological quality. The characteristics and main findings of the studies were extracted and reported. Results: Thirty-seven studies met the inclusion criteria, and the methodological quality of the majority was moderate to high. While patients of the group in question recover their global QoL by 12 months after treatment, a number of outstanding issues persist - deterioration in physical functioning, fatigue, xerostomia and sticky saliva. Age, cancer site, stage of disease, social support, smoking, feeding tube placement and alcohol consumption are the significant determinants of QoL at 12 months, while gender has little or no influence. Conclusions: Regular assessments should be carried out to monitor physical functioning, degree of fatigue, xerostomia and sticky saliva. Further research is required to develop appropriate and effective interventions to deal with these issues, and thus to promote the patients' QoL.
KW - Cancer survivors
KW - Critical appraisal
KW - Head and neck cancer
KW - Quality-of-life
KW - Symptoms
KW - Systematic review
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84866740902&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ejca.2012.04.005
DO - 10.1016/j.ejca.2012.04.005
M3 - Article
C2 - 22579456
AN - SCOPUS:84866740902
SN - 0959-8049
VL - 48
SP - 2391
EP - 2408
JO - European Journal of Cancer
JF - European Journal of Cancer
IS - 15
ER -