Recognition in relationships between young people with cognitive disabilities and support workers

Sally Robinson, Megan Blaxland, Karen R. Fisher, Kelley Johnson, Caiyue Kuang, Anne Graham, Kate Neale

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    5 Citations (Scopus)
    13 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    The research used Honneth's interpersonal recognition theory (caring about, respecting and valuing), mediated by the institutional context, to explore how young people with cognitive disabilities and support workers view the quality of their relationship. Such understanding can inform improvements to how they work together and can influence their identities and wellbeing. Separate online surveys for young people with cognitive disabilities (81) and paid workers (56) were developed based on earlier findings from in-depth qualitative research. Most respondents experienced recognition within their support relationships. The recognition positively related to the length of the relationship and differed by characteristics such as location. The findings suggest that recognition was mutually experienced by the young people and workers. The findings draw attention to the ways social services might foster mutual recognition by promoting practices that demonstrate caring, respect and valuing. They might advocate for policy that highlights mutual recognition in paid support.

    Original languageEnglish
    Article number105177
    Number of pages9
    JournalChildren and Youth Services Review
    Volume116
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Sept 2020

    Bibliographical note

    This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/BY-NC-ND/4.0/).

    Keywords

    • Disabilities
    • Disability policy
    • Intellectual disabilities
    • Interpersonal recognition

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Recognition in relationships between young people with cognitive disabilities and support workers'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this