Reflection on the development of a research agenda in rural health

Lisa Bourke, James Best, John Wakerman, John Humphreys, Julian Wright

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    1 Citation (Scopus)


    There is a dearth of literature on how research agendas have been developed. In this article, the authors reflect on the process of developing a research agenda through a case study of a rural health university centre. The aim is to contribute to understanding how a team can effectively plan research. Two leaders of the process, as well as academics external to the process, reflected on the experience and the outcome of the agenda development process. Reflections focused on three areas: (a) engagement levels, (b) power and influence, and (c) interpretation of the research agenda. First, while there was passionate discussion at meetings and afterward, engagement levels varied. Second, the process was imbued with power and influence at multiple levels. Finally, the availability of a conceptual framework to contextualise rural and remote health research helped in interpreting the significance of the resulting research agenda. The article concludes with contrasting thoughts on the place of research agendas within contemporary neoliberal regimes of research management.

    Original languageEnglish
    Article numberM1
    Number of pages19
    JournalJournal of Research Pratice
    Issue number1
    Publication statusPublished - 2015


    • Peer reflection
    • Research agenda
    • Research leadership
    • Research management
    • Research planning
    • Rural health


    Dive into the research topics of 'Reflection on the development of a research agenda in rural health'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this