Reflection on the RANZCP position on the adverse effects of psychotherapy

Stephen Allison; Jeffrey C.L. Looi; Steve Kisely; Tarun Bastiampillai

doi:10.1177/10398562241280362

Reflection on the RANZCP position on the adverse effects of psychotherapy

Stephen Allison, Jeffrey C.L. Looi, Steve Kisely, Tarun Bastiampillai

College of Medicine and Public Health

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

27 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Objective: In this perspective, we investigate how the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists’ (RANZCP) position statement on psychotherapy takes the potential for adverse effects into account.

Conclusions: Psychotherapy has two critical outcomes – efficacy and adverse effects. Evidence-based psychotherapy is significantly more effective than care-as-usual for about one in 10 psychotherapy patients. However, a similar proportion also reports adverse effects. Despite this, the RANZCP position statement on psychotherapy focuses on efficacy with minimal discussion of the adverse effects. This is an oversight because psychiatrists have legal and ethical obligations to consider the adverse effects as well as the benefits of any treatment. We therefore reflect on the RANZCP’s six recommendations in light of the adverse effects of psychotherapy.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	28-32
Number of pages	5
Journal	Australasian Psychiatry
Volume	33
Issue number	1
Early online date	4 Sept 2024
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1177/10398562241280362
Publication status	Published - Feb 2025

Keywords

adverse effects
monitoring and evaluation of therapy
psychotherapy

Access to Document

10.1177/10398562241280362Licence: CC BY

Final published versionFinal published version, 537 KBLicence: CC BY

Cite this

@article{8c57c6a2343d415f89b62bb0028ca8e1,

title = "Reflection on the RANZCP position on the adverse effects of psychotherapy",

abstract = "Objective: In this perspective, we investigate how the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists{\textquoteright} (RANZCP) position statement on psychotherapy takes the potential for adverse effects into account. Conclusions: Psychotherapy has two critical outcomes – efficacy and adverse effects. Evidence-based psychotherapy is significantly more effective than care-as-usual for about one in 10 psychotherapy patients. However, a similar proportion also reports adverse effects. Despite this, the RANZCP position statement on psychotherapy focuses on efficacy with minimal discussion of the adverse effects. This is an oversight because psychiatrists have legal and ethical obligations to consider the adverse effects as well as the benefits of any treatment. We therefore reflect on the RANZCP{\textquoteright}s six recommendations in light of the adverse effects of psychotherapy.",

keywords = "adverse effects, monitoring and evaluation of therapy, psychotherapy",

author = "Stephen Allison and Looi, {Jeffrey C.L.} and Steve Kisely and Tarun Bastiampillai",

year = "2025",

month = feb,

doi = "10.1177/10398562241280362",

language = "English",

volume = "33",

pages = "28--32",

journal = "Australasian Psychiatry",

issn = "1039-8562",

publisher = "Blackwell Publishing",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reflection on the RANZCP position on the adverse effects of psychotherapy

AU - Allison, Stephen

AU - Looi, Jeffrey C.L.

AU - Kisely, Steve

AU - Bastiampillai, Tarun

PY - 2025/2

Y1 - 2025/2

N2 - Objective: In this perspective, we investigate how the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists’ (RANZCP) position statement on psychotherapy takes the potential for adverse effects into account. Conclusions: Psychotherapy has two critical outcomes – efficacy and adverse effects. Evidence-based psychotherapy is significantly more effective than care-as-usual for about one in 10 psychotherapy patients. However, a similar proportion also reports adverse effects. Despite this, the RANZCP position statement on psychotherapy focuses on efficacy with minimal discussion of the adverse effects. This is an oversight because psychiatrists have legal and ethical obligations to consider the adverse effects as well as the benefits of any treatment. We therefore reflect on the RANZCP’s six recommendations in light of the adverse effects of psychotherapy.

AB - Objective: In this perspective, we investigate how the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists’ (RANZCP) position statement on psychotherapy takes the potential for adverse effects into account. Conclusions: Psychotherapy has two critical outcomes – efficacy and adverse effects. Evidence-based psychotherapy is significantly more effective than care-as-usual for about one in 10 psychotherapy patients. However, a similar proportion also reports adverse effects. Despite this, the RANZCP position statement on psychotherapy focuses on efficacy with minimal discussion of the adverse effects. This is an oversight because psychiatrists have legal and ethical obligations to consider the adverse effects as well as the benefits of any treatment. We therefore reflect on the RANZCP’s six recommendations in light of the adverse effects of psychotherapy.

KW - adverse effects

KW - monitoring and evaluation of therapy

KW - psychotherapy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85203251971&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/10398562241280362

DO - 10.1177/10398562241280362

M3 - Article

C2 - 39229936

AN - SCOPUS:85203251971

SN - 1039-8562

VL - 33

SP - 28

EP - 32

JO - Australasian Psychiatry

JF - Australasian Psychiatry

IS - 1

ER -

Reflection on the RANZCP position on the adverse effects of psychotherapy

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this