TY - JOUR
T1 - Reintervention after Mobile-bearing Oxford Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty
AU - Clark, Marcia
AU - Campbell, David
AU - Kiss, Gregory
AU - Dobson, Peter
AU - Lewis, Peter
PY - 2010/2
Y1 - 2010/2
N2 - Background: Medial compartment osteoarthritis is a common disorder that often is treated by unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). Although the Oxford 3 prosthesis is commonly used based on revision rate and cumulative survival, our experience suggests that although there may be adequate implant survival rates, we observed a worrisome and undisclosed reintervention rate of nonrevision procedures. Purpose: We describe the frequency and cause of repeat intervention subsequent to implanting this device. Methods: Between 1998 and 2005, 398 patients underwent UKA using the Oxford 3 prosthesis. The minimum followup was 12 months (mean, 43 months; range, 12-102 months). Results: Forty of the 398 (10%) patients had 55 (13.8%) repeat anesthetics (reintervention). There were 38 nonrevision reinterventions. Revision was performed in 15 patients (3.8%), but two patients had a second revision (17 revisions or 4.3%). We revised the UKA to a second UKA in seven of the 15 cases but two subsequently were rerevised to a TKA; eight were revised directly to a TKA. Conclusions: Although our data confirm the reported revision rates for this prosthesis, we observed a substantial reintervention rate. Most of the reinterventions are minor and are diagnosed frequently and treated arthroscopically. If revision is required, a second UKA may be considered and performed successfully in patients with isolated loosening of one component. Level of Evidence: Level II, prognostic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
AB - Background: Medial compartment osteoarthritis is a common disorder that often is treated by unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). Although the Oxford 3 prosthesis is commonly used based on revision rate and cumulative survival, our experience suggests that although there may be adequate implant survival rates, we observed a worrisome and undisclosed reintervention rate of nonrevision procedures. Purpose: We describe the frequency and cause of repeat intervention subsequent to implanting this device. Methods: Between 1998 and 2005, 398 patients underwent UKA using the Oxford 3 prosthesis. The minimum followup was 12 months (mean, 43 months; range, 12-102 months). Results: Forty of the 398 (10%) patients had 55 (13.8%) repeat anesthetics (reintervention). There were 38 nonrevision reinterventions. Revision was performed in 15 patients (3.8%), but two patients had a second revision (17 revisions or 4.3%). We revised the UKA to a second UKA in seven of the 15 cases but two subsequently were rerevised to a TKA; eight were revised directly to a TKA. Conclusions: Although our data confirm the reported revision rates for this prosthesis, we observed a substantial reintervention rate. Most of the reinterventions are minor and are diagnosed frequently and treated arthroscopically. If revision is required, a second UKA may be considered and performed successfully in patients with isolated loosening of one component. Level of Evidence: Level II, prognostic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=76249105636&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11999-009-1089-y
DO - 10.1007/s11999-009-1089-y
M3 - Article
SN - 0009-921X
VL - 468
SP - 576
EP - 580
JO - Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research
JF - Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research
IS - 2
ER -