REPLY

Antonia Kolovos, Ayub Qassim, Mark M. Hassall, Emmanuelle Souzeau, Owen M. Siggs, Jamie E. Craig

Research output: Contribution to journalLetterpeer-review

Abstract

Reply:
We thank Drs Guo and Chen for their interest in our article and appreciate the opportunity to respond to their correspondence.

First, Guo and Chen raise the potential for conflation of shared pathways between pseudoexfoliation (PEX) and glaucoma pathogenesis in our polygenic risk score (PRS). Although variants at ABCA1 and LMX1B may influence multiple biological pathways, this does not invalidate the usefulness of PRS in capturing glaucoma risk. Rather, it reflects the polygenic and pleiotropic nature of complex traits. Use of the PRS does not require mechanistic isolation of each variant’s effect; instead, it operates at a probabilistic level to quantify inherited risk across the genome...
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)e155-e156
Number of pages2
JournalOphthalmology
Volume132
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2025

Keywords

  • glaucoma
  • PGS
  • POAG
  • polygenic risk score
  • polygenic score
  • PRS

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'REPLY'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this