Reply from Lynch et al. to Letter from Vedpathak and Shah Regarding ‘When Should Physical Rehabilitation Commence after Stroke: A Systematic Review’

Translated title of the contribution: Reply from Lynch et al. to Letter from Vedpathak and Shah : Regarding ‘When Should Physical Rehabilitation Commence after Stroke: A Systematic Review’

Elizabeth Lynch, Susan Hillier, Dominique Cadilhac

Research output: Contribution to journalLetterpeer-review

Abstract

Dear editor,

We read with interest the letter to the editor (1) regarding our systematic review ‘When should physical rehabilitation commence after stroke: a systematic review’ (2).

Translated title of the contributionReply from Lynch et al. to Letter from Vedpathak and Shah : Regarding ‘When Should Physical Rehabilitation Commence after Stroke: A Systematic Review’
Original languageAmerican English
Pages (from-to)E12-E12
Number of pages1
JournalInternational Journal of Stroke
Volume10
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2015
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Letter
  • correspondence
  • reply
  • Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health
  • Sumant Vedpathak
  • Preeti Shah
  • physical rehabilitation
  • rehabilitation after stroke
  • Stroke aftercare

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Reply from Lynch et al. to Letter from Vedpathak and Shah : Regarding ‘When Should Physical Rehabilitation Commence after Stroke: A Systematic Review’'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this