Reply to Santiago-Rodriguez et al.: Was luxS really isolated from 25- to 40-million-year-old bacteria?

Laura Weyrich, Bastien Llamas, Alan Cooper

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article

10 Citations (Scopus)

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	85-86
Number of pages	2
Journal	FEMS Microbiology Letters
Volume	353
Issue number	2
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1111/1574-6968.12415
Publication status	Published - 2014

Access to Document

10.1111/1574-6968.12415

Cite this

Weyrich, L., Llamas, B., & Cooper, A. (2014). Reply to Santiago-Rodriguez et al.: Was luxS really isolated from 25- to 40-million-year-old bacteria? FEMS Microbiology Letters, 353(2), 85-86. https://doi.org/10.1111/1574-6968.12415

@article{47ccaa1aa6634cf0b5d37438e9f4a407,

title = "Reply to Santiago-Rodriguez et al.: Was luxS really isolated from 25- to 40-million-year-old bacteria?",

author = "Laura Weyrich and Bastien Llamas and Alan Cooper",

year = "2014",

doi = "10.1111/1574-6968.12415",

language = "English",

volume = "353",

pages = "85--86",

journal = "FEMS Microbiology Letters",

issn = "0378-1097",

publisher = "Elsevier",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reply to Santiago-Rodriguez et al.: Was luxS really isolated from 25- to 40-million-year-old bacteria?

AU - Weyrich, Laura

AU - Llamas, Bastien

AU - Cooper, Alan

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

U2 - 10.1111/1574-6968.12415

DO - 10.1111/1574-6968.12415

M3 - Article

VL - 353

SP - 85

EP - 86

JO - FEMS Microbiology Letters

JF - FEMS Microbiology Letters

SN - 0378-1097

IS - 2

ER -