TY - JOUR
T1 - Republished
T2 - Value of white cell count in predicting serious bacterial infection in febrile children under 5 years of age
AU - De, Sukanya
AU - Williams, Gabrielle J
AU - Hayen, Andrew
AU - MacAskill, Petra
AU - McCaskill, Mary
AU - Isaacs, David
AU - Craig, Jonathan C
PY - 2015/3
Y1 - 2015/3
N2 - Objective: The leukocyte count is frequently used to evaluate suspected bacterial infections but estimates of its test performance vary considerably. We evaluated its accuracy for the detection of serious bacterial infections in febrile children. Design: Prospective cohort study. Setting: Paediatric emergency department. Patients: Febrile 0–5-year-olds who had a leukocyte Outcome measures: Accuracy of total white blood cell and absolute neutrophil counts for the detection of urinary tract infection, bacteraemia, pneumonia and a combined (‘any serious bacterial infection’) category. Logistic regression models were fitted for each outcome. Reference standards were microbiological/radiological tests and clinical follow-up. Results: Serious bacterial infections were present in 714 (18.3%) of 3893 illness episodes. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for ‘any serious bacterial infection’ was 0.653 (95% CI 0.630 to 0.676) for the total white blood cell count and 0.638 (95% CI 0.615 to 0.662) for absolute neutrophil count. A white blood cell count threshold >15×109/L had a sensitivity of 47% (95% CI 43% to 50%), specificity 76% (95% CI 74% to 77%), positive likelihood ratio 1.93 (95% CI 1.75 to 2.13) and negative likelihood ratio 0.70 (95% CI 0.65 to 0.75). An absolute neutrophil count threshold >10×109/L had a sensitivity of 41% (95% CI 38% to 45%), specificity 78% (95% CI 76% to 79%), positive likelihood ratio 1.87 (95% CI 1.68 to 2.09) and negative likelihood ratio 0.75 (95% CI 0.71 to 0.80). Conclusions: The total white blood cell count and absolute neutrophil count are not sufficiently accurate triage tests for febrile children with suspected serious bacterial infection.
AB - Objective: The leukocyte count is frequently used to evaluate suspected bacterial infections but estimates of its test performance vary considerably. We evaluated its accuracy for the detection of serious bacterial infections in febrile children. Design: Prospective cohort study. Setting: Paediatric emergency department. Patients: Febrile 0–5-year-olds who had a leukocyte Outcome measures: Accuracy of total white blood cell and absolute neutrophil counts for the detection of urinary tract infection, bacteraemia, pneumonia and a combined (‘any serious bacterial infection’) category. Logistic regression models were fitted for each outcome. Reference standards were microbiological/radiological tests and clinical follow-up. Results: Serious bacterial infections were present in 714 (18.3%) of 3893 illness episodes. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for ‘any serious bacterial infection’ was 0.653 (95% CI 0.630 to 0.676) for the total white blood cell count and 0.638 (95% CI 0.615 to 0.662) for absolute neutrophil count. A white blood cell count threshold >15×109/L had a sensitivity of 47% (95% CI 43% to 50%), specificity 76% (95% CI 74% to 77%), positive likelihood ratio 1.93 (95% CI 1.75 to 2.13) and negative likelihood ratio 0.70 (95% CI 0.65 to 0.75). An absolute neutrophil count threshold >10×109/L had a sensitivity of 41% (95% CI 38% to 45%), specificity 78% (95% CI 76% to 79%), positive likelihood ratio 1.87 (95% CI 1.68 to 2.09) and negative likelihood ratio 0.75 (95% CI 0.71 to 0.80). Conclusions: The total white blood cell count and absolute neutrophil count are not sufficiently accurate triage tests for febrile children with suspected serious bacterial infection.
KW - Febrile children
KW - White blood cell count
KW - Absolute neutrophil count
KW - Bacterial infections
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84924672158&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://purl.org/au-research/grants/NHMRC/211205
UR - http://purl.org/au-research/grants/NHMRC/402764
U2 - 10.1136/postgradmedj-2013-304754rep
DO - 10.1136/postgradmedj-2013-304754rep
M3 - Article
SN - 0032-5473
VL - 91
SP - 493
EP - 499
JO - Postgraduate Medical Journal
JF - Postgraduate Medical Journal
IS - 1073
ER -