Research Exceptionalism

James Wilson, David Hunter

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    42 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Research involving human subjects is much more stringently regulated than many other nonresearch activities that appear to be at least as risky. A number of prominent figures now argue that research is overregulated. We argue that the reasons typically offered to justify the present system of research regulation fail to show that research should be subject to more stringent regulation than other equally risky activities. However, there are three often overlooked reasons for thinking that research should be treated as a special case. First, research typically involves the imposition of risk on people who do not benefit from this risk imposition. Second, research depends on public trust. Third, the complexity of the moral decision making required favors ethics committees as a regulative solution for research.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)45-54
    Number of pages10
    JournalAmerican Journal of Bioethics
    Volume10
    Issue number8
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2010

    Keywords

    • Ethics committees
    • Human subjects research
    • Professional ethics
    • Regulatory issues
    • Research ethics
    • Risk/benefit analysis

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Research Exceptionalism'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this