Abstract
It is a startling experience to look down a microscope at a stone tool — a real Palaeolithic artefact, not a modern thing or a replicated copy — and see on its flint surface grubby brown-red stains that look the colour of old blood. Is a consensus emerging from the archaeological scientists as to just what traces of, especially, biological materials do survive on ancient stone surfaces, where they can be reliably characterized and identified?.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 740-745 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| Journal | Antiquity |
| Volume | 70 |
| Issue number | 270 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Dec 1996 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Residues on stone artefacts: State of a scientific art'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver